I think you're missing the point.

Bush said Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. There were no such weapons found.

Bush said Saddam was in cahoots with Al Qaeda. Saddam was not in cahoots with Al Qaeda, and in fact had turned down their requests for assistance.

Bush said that Saddam was a brutal, bloodthirsty dictator (which is true) who had no moral right to treat his countrymen as harshly as he did. Now you're saying that that's really the only way to run the country.

Leaves me wondering just exactly what Saddam was expected to do. <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />