ETS doesn't sell products. ETS reviews products impartially and has a non-profit relationship with the product manufacturers. ETS doesn't recieve any compensation from manufacturers or retailers for these reviews. ETS doesn't stand to make a penny from the sale of any product reviewed nor to lose money if these products do not sell. If ETS chooses to use Mr. Ralstons story to exemplify the value or utility of a class of products then that is just what it is and nothing more. Please re-read the article yourself. Mr. Ralstons story was used to highlight the utility of a class of products without specifically mentioning a specific product brand or model because even the manufacturers of these products haven't put them on the market yet. This is equivalent to saying "you don't need to have your loved ones burn't to a crisp like Mr. Jones because as of december '04 someone else, whom I have no commercial relationship with, will be finally allowed by the government to sell fire extinguishers, which up till now they have not been able to sell.

If you cannot see the distinction... 8(