My first experience with topo charts was flying low level visual navigation in flight school. We'd layout our planned course and stay on it. We marked the chart to indicate where we should be at any given time given the velocity we had planned. In mountainous terrain, navigation was fairly easy because we could see the terrain features clearly from altitude.
At ground level, those terrain features become obscured from things like trees and brush. The "trail" you're walking suddenly becomes overgrown and then disappears, or whoa, there's more than one trail and that's not on the chart. . . Map and compass usually works, but sometimes it's nice to turn on the GPS, get a good fix of where you are really, and then proceed knowing you're on the right path.
Loading key waypoints into the GPS before the hike and adding points of interest along the way makes even a non-mapping GPS like I carry (
Garmin Geko 301) very useful. The
Geko 201 and
101 come in the same small package and are less expensive with fewer features.
I find these GPS receivers ideal if your primary navigation is with map and compass. They are small and light (3.9'' H x 1.9'' W x 0.96'' D and 3.4 oz) and a pair of AAA alkaline will go 9-12 hours. If you have no use for the baro altimeter, go with the 201, waypoints, routes and saved track files are the same and it gets better battery life.