I guess I don't read as much into that Grizzly Adams jibe as some here. I agree that food should be lower in priority that other things. I'd be more concerned about shelter, warmth, signalling, and water. Only AFTER those things are covered would I move on to finding food. I carry enough spare food to cover my needs in the short term (I hope!) "Initially, other things are more important" is the point I think the article's authors were trying to make. Maybe headlined less than optimally in an attempt to grab your attention, but a valid point none-the-less. I thought the article was quite good myself. Especially considering it came from a magazine not normally associated with outdoors survival.