Urals have had a lot of quality control issues in the past. The US distributor has made great strides in getting the factory to address the problems, and current models are far more reliable than a unit made even a couple years ago. I work with someone who has a Ural Gear-Up (the 2wd camo model) and he hasn't (so far) had any major issues with his rig in the year or so he's had it.
Some things to keep in mind:
* The Ural is essentially a 60 year old design. That means you can rebuild the engine on the side of the road with common tools if necessary. It also means you may HAVE to rebuild the engine on the side of the road. (If you're mechanically inclined and like working on engines, this could be a selling point.)
Think about the Ural this way: Would you use a 1940 Ford truck as your bug-out vehicle? You might if you knew a lot about working on 1940 Fords. You probably wouldn't if you were uncomfortable changing your car's oil.
* Driving a sidecar rig is very different from riding a two-wheeled motorcycle. If you decide to pursue the Ural option, look into taking a S/TEP (sidecar/trike education program) class. Many of the same groups that teach MSF (motorcycle safety foundation) rider courses also offer sidecar training. One nice part of the S/TEP (and MSF) classes: They provide the bikes to learn on.
* A sidecar rig isn't much narrower than a car. A Jeep can go more places than the Ural, carry more people and gear, and is far easier to find parts (and mechanics) for.
Here's a source for more info: Go to
www.advrider.com and do a search for "ural sidecar". You should get a bunch of threads about them.
My 2 cents: I've been riding motorcycles for years. I took the S/TEP class a couple years ago to learn how to ride a sidecar rig. One of the rigs provided for the class was a Ural (not 2wd, though). I liked it a lot, but it felt like riding a 40 year old motorcycle. If I had the money and garage space, I'd love to have a Ural rig for fun -- but I'll keep my Toyota 4x4 truck to use as my bug-out vehicle.
Dave F>