I'll go with OC, but I have the check with the voices in my head first.

They know best.

I don't know, man- how many of us consider ourselves naked without a flashlight, pocketknife/multitool/SAK, and a firestarter of some type? How many of us ALWAYS check a room for exits the first time we enter it. How many of us carry a compass in the city, or water purification tablets?

We don't think these are abnormal behaviors. But is not sanity the delusion that most people suffer from? You know, the people we think are nuts becuase they go outside improperly dressed. I mean, they don't even have a single knife on them, much less three or four- don't they know that children might see them? Have they no shame?

But always remember that 911 is government sponsered dial-a-prayer.

My beef with that article is that is again lays the blame at the FEDERAL government. What about the INDIVIDUAL? The feds have nothing to do with personal survival in a natural disaster. At best the state government should be watching, more appropriately it should be a local issue since natural distasters are usually highly regionally specific.

I also like how they single out the US for this. I'd LOVE to see what Europeans or the Japanese stockpile. If a New Orleans level event happened to Singapore, Hong Kong, or London, I suspect the death toll would be similar, probably MUCH higher.

Well most people see preparness and disaster relief as responsibility of goverment. So it's natural for those people to blame the goverment when things go wrong.

i agrea that people should have some responsibility too. The US is going a reasonable job at trying to educate and get people involved in to emergency preparness and stuff. Much more than mine goverment is doing. Mine goverment ( holland ) is doing almost nothing to educate people about emergency preparness. One of the reasons is not to scare people too much. Personally i think ignorance would be more dangerous... Instead they invest huge amount of money to prevent things. So the chance people need emergency equipment and skills would be considerable less.

Due to the very diffrent methode of orginasation, you really can't just compare one country's system with the other.

It's like a fire department that won't respond to fires because there's a fire, and fires are dangerous. <img src="/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />

Then why the heck do they exist.

Talk about the ultimate Catch-22.

Same at my former school. Nobody knew I carried a FAK and would actually HELP PEOPLE that were injured in stead of laughing at them.
Then a teacher passed out drunk in the class. Then they knew...... <img src="/images/graemlins/smirk.gif" alt="" />

"My beef with that article is that is again lays the blame at the FEDERAL government."

I must admit that I read the article very quickly, but that wasn't the impression that I received. The federal government used to be the people, but it hasn't been for a long time. Now our governments (federal and local) are made up of people whose sole interests are in getting re-elected and not making decisions that will irritate voters. Period. They're not going to do anything unless a majority of their voters insist. And no one is going to insist.

I don't know about the rest of the world, but Americans are totally unrealistic as a group. We've been trained that way. Take a really, REALLY good look at the nation's pacifier: television. Thinking isn't even an issue. All synthetic problems are solved within 30 minutes or an hour (minus commmercials). We're a nation of armchair athletes with a beer in one hand and the remote in the other. Soap operas (or whatever they're called today) are immensely popular. Un-reality shows are ridiculous. Every single "real" issue is sugar-coated, so as to be palatable to the masses.

So, why does anyone expect the Average American to do anything? They haven't had to, so far. The reasons listed in the article as to why they don't are totally accurate, IMO.

Americans have been trained to be ignorant, lazy, ineffective morons for the last 100+ years. Government learned back in the days of the Industrial Revolution that an ignorant populace was a far more easily manipulated populace. Do you really think that any govenment entity, anywhere on the scale, really gives two cents if their constituents survive ANY disaster?

(My mother repeatedly told me that snorthing in derision isn't ladylike. That, among other instruction, just never seemed to "take". <img src="/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

Sue

I had something like that happen once. No one was hurt, but the two lane road had suddenly turned into one lane, so someone who can direct traffic (too many years as a flagger in highschool) was useful. My coworker actually had the audacity to yell at me becuase it made us late getting back to the office, and he was going to have to file paperwork late. I told him to go on without me, but he wasn't going to leave me behind becuase he was afraid the boss would yell at him.

I think that was the day my hope for humanity started to die.

But that's just it- how can it be a decision? It should be built it, as instinct. We're frippin pack animals! Sure, we can outthink most problems, but without also being able to outnumber them, most of them would have eaten our ancesestors. All of them.

*sighs*

Oh, and I'd rather be horizontal. You draw less fire that way. <img src="/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />