Yep,

Testing requires that the person doing so has experience with the equipment, can make unbiased assessments, and can write it up in an intelligent and hopefully useful manner. I think a lot of folks like what Doug writes simply because he's clear, honest, and has a lot of credibility. Doing what he does requires money and time, so I'm happy to have access to what is already there. Of course I'm like JIM and others in that I'm sure we all would like more. One thing I would really like to see is a bit of a reorg/redesign. That's probably something with which I could help, but again, you are left with quality control and personal preferences. <img src="/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> But I would certainly help out if I could.