If this study was scientifically done and the results were "100% recovery for 322 victims", shouldn't we have seen it published by now? I'm more than a little skeptical. That's certainly a miraculous success rate - worthy of front page headlines (and not just on the National Enquirer!) The early 80's was a quarter century ago, plenty of time for the study to have gone through peer review and been published. "Grab a sparkplug and take a vitamen" is not a treatment I'd be inclined to follow without some type of medical/scientific review confirming the study's conclusions. It just sounds ... weird <img src="/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />