#65366 - 05/08/06 12:58 PM
The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I believe our great country is now in a much more vulnerable position than a decade ago; I don't want to go into the blame-game... the fact is, we've [censored]*d off some very dangerous people and eventually our homelands will once again be targeted by terrorists. So, what about the uneasy topic of radiation poisoning due to a dirty bomb or other threats.? It's not a pleasent topic to research; preparation for such a disaster will take some people back to the 1960s "buried in the backyard" shelters. But, realistically, what if you are exposed? I know there are sites that deal with this very topic, the effects and possible treatment. While you can get potassium iodide fairly easily, I've yet to find radiation indicators that are inexpensive. There are some stickers that the government uses on MRE cases that are indicators, and there are civilian key-ring type indicators, anyone know of any others. Has anyone really explored what it would take to protect yourself in a dirty-bomb scenario?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65367 - 05/08/06 03:35 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
There are three ways to protect yourself from radiation:
-Distance -Barrier -Shielding
Of these, distance is the best. Since the amount of radiatin that reaches you (assuming a sherical or point source) is inversly proportional to the square of your distance increase (going from 1 to two feet, doubling your distance, cuts radiation to a quarter. If you go from 1 to eight feet, you have only 1/64th of the original radiation to contend with, etc.), it is your best defense BY FAR. No pun intended.
Second: Barrier. This method prevents radioactive materials from coming into direct contact with you. Especially useful if you are in an affected area and plan to leave it, or in cases of high-alpha dust. Example: Plutonium. A five-gram chunk of plutonium will kill you within months, through cancer. ONE TENTH of a gram of plutonium, enhaled as micron-sized dust, kills you inside six hours by destroying all blood cells through radiation. Why? Alpha radiation has extremely short range, a piece of paper stops it. Barrier protection, such as full-body, gastight suits with independant air supply prevent and plutionium or other dust from getting dragged into safe zones, or from being inhaled or otherwise absorbed into the body, where they are most dangerous. This type of protection allows the user to shed any radioactive material on entering a safe zone. Suits should NOT be re-used, a decon shower should be taken after removing the suit, just in case.
Third: Shielding. The least practical method. To stop beta radiation, you'll need to lug around 2mm aluminium plates, all over your body. For gamma, try 15 centimeters of lead. For neutron radiation... find a lake about 20 meters deep. Live on the bottom. Shielding is only practical in shelters, where it must be combined with barrier methods (used on air intakes and locks) to be effective.
A note about indicators: If you really are close enough to a dirty bomb to need immediate treatment, go jump in front of a train. If you exhibit radiation poisoning, future cancer is as good as guaranteed.
If you don't get rad poisoning, someone (the authorities) will soon (two-digit minutes) realize what that bomb was, and shove everyone in the area through emergency decon.
Thus: Indicators are relatively useless, TBH.
In a Dirty Bomb (or other NBC) scenario, I'd make tracks for the fire station, gear up, and head out with the NBC detection/Decon team. Best way to do it really.
Edited by ThatGermanGuy (05/08/06 03:38 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65368 - 05/08/06 06:58 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Registered: 09/04/05
Posts: 417
Loc: Illinois
|
In short... decontamination and shielding. Wash off any fallout outside of your shelter, and get to shelter with sufficient mass to shield you from the radiation emmanating from the fallout out side the shelter. It's just the opposite of what we do at the Nuc. plants... got crapped up??? Get a shower, and stay out of the "can" for the rest of the shift... sorry it's not a bit more dramatic, but that's about as good as it gets... if the exposure is too long or too intense, or if the shielding isn't extensive enough, ya get ta cook.
Troy
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65369 - 05/08/06 07:13 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Registered: 09/04/05
Posts: 417
Loc: Illinois
|
Great reply, especially the part about the train <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />... just curious, what field are you in? I'm a contract laborer at various Nuc plants, lots of CCS work. Your explanation was dead on, couldn't have said it better myself.
Troy
PS CCS = Contamination Control Specialist... a fancy name for VERY good housekeeping <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65370 - 05/09/06 04:17 AM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Member
Registered: 02/16/06
Posts: 144
Loc: Kingman AZ
|
Yeah, the problem is more pronounced in congested areas where the population density makes it hard to get out of the contaminated area quickly. Washing any (fallout) contamination from you body, and filtering your breathing air (even a simple surgical mask) is the first lines of defense. getting out of the contaminated area will best protect you from long term effects. If that isn't possible, reducing exposure to airborne contaminants is essential. plastic sheeting and wet sheets work well. Radioactive contamination is particulate contamination. Hose your house down and run your sprinklers until the water runs off into the storm sewers. not perfect, but better than being dosed daily with radiation.
_________________________
What you know isn't as important as knowing what you don't know
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65371 - 05/09/06 08:27 AM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I do NBC decontamination and detection for the local fire department. Nice work actually, though these porta-saunas we call chem suits are annoying at times.
Desert Rat: Surical mask? If some "sandhead" (or whatever type of terrorist you prefer <img src="/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />) actually manages to get a few pounds of Highly active nuclear waste, I think he's going to spend the extra three days to micron-mill the stuff. And no surgical mask stops stuff below 5 or 6 microns in size, because the mask (with its tiny transmissive surface area, comnpared to military "gas" masks) would be too restrictive, and because quite a lot of air will always leak around the edge. Result: Chuck the mask. Useless.
What I agree about is the shower. Do as such:
-5 minutes hich-pressure (4+ atmospheres) solid water jet shower. -rinse shower area -scrub down with "clean" sand for 10 minutes. Hard. You're not done until it HURTS. -another 5 minutes' worth of shower.
This will not only rinse your skin, but actually remove the top layer, thus removing any particles that would normally stick. This can also be accomplished by applying sodium hypochlorite, although the resulting chlorine would kill in an enclosed space. Hypo is also good for B or C decon.
Plastic sheeting and wet sheets work... not well, but are better than nothing. Think about it: You envelope your body in one or multiple airtight sheets of material. You move. The configuration, and thus the volume of the whole thing changes. Air is exchanged with the outside through holes and mostly the seams of you jury-rigged suit. Really, not much, but it's something.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65372 - 05/09/06 11:29 AM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Old Hand
Registered: 11/10/03
Posts: 710
Loc: Augusta, GA
|
Just to kind of summarize, there are two "types" of exposure: 1) Irradiated 2) Contaiminated 1) You've been near the source and gotten alpha, beta or gamma ray exposure. The damage is now done, nothing you can really do. If I remember correctly. 2) You've been contaiminated with debris that is radioactive. You can remove most with a shower, and you or someone else won't be "radioactive". There are a few FEMA Independent Study course available through the Virtual Campus that covers this information. Specifically IS-3 and IS-301. FEMA On-line Training Website - Main Page FEMA Independent Study Course List
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65373 - 05/09/06 09:56 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Registered: 09/04/05
Posts: 417
Loc: Illinois
|
We don't go through quite that brutal of a shower routine, but then again, we've got access to meters to localize hot particles, at which point, duct tape does wonders (OUCH in the hairy spots) <img src="/images/graemlins/shocked.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
Troy
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65374 - 05/09/06 10:07 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Registered: 09/04/05
Posts: 417
Loc: Illinois
|
You're forgetting internal uptake... when you inhale or swallow hot particles. If the uptake is significant enough, refer to the comment ragarding stepping in front of a train (man, that's a good line <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />), if the uptake isn't that significant, anything in your lungs just has to "burn" itself out... radioactive half-life of the particle will determine how long you remain "hot". If the particle is swallowed, it's common practice in the trades to drink plenty of beer, and hopefully, you'll "flush" the problematic particle out of your system. Again, it's not real technical, but that's what the folks that are dealing with it on a daily basis are doing <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
Troy
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65375 - 05/10/06 02:39 AM
Re:Potassium Iodide for Radiation Poisoning
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So where does Potassium Iodide come into the picture? Is it a common medication taken after contamination? Always? Sometimes? I would assume the cleanup decontamination is most important first, yes?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65376 - 05/10/06 12:37 PM
Re:Potassium Iodide for Radiation Poisoning
|
Journeyman
Registered: 09/05/05
Posts: 54
Loc: The End of the World, Iraq
|
dbeeksci, you might as well forget about the Potassium Iodide, it's more of a band-aid fix in a situation that requires a tornoquet. As the other guys said, two major hazards: Particulate: Alpha and Beta particles, commonly called fallout. Keeping the dust and ash in a "Magic Mushroom" scenario is imperative, but very difficult depending upon the density (CPM's) and extent of the contamination. A rain suit with hood, boots and some creative use of duct tape works fine. For repiratory under 10K CPM, you need a very high efficiency filter on a full face mask, taped to your hood to form a seal. Over 10K CPM, you need Positive Pressure Full Face SCBA or supplied air, at that rate, it's so thick, it will clog a filter. In our "dirty" training room in Albuquerque, the stuff looks like talcum powder, and just fills the air from walking around in it, it's like a fog. Granted, Alpha particles can usually be just washed and brushed off. We recently have dropped the "sand scrub" technique recently in lieu of "duct tape patting", I'm not sure wich one sucks worse. The upside to sand or cornmeal scrubbing is if you are alone (or not within a CCA) you can get the vast majority of material off of yourself, the downside is that if any is left, you are just grinding it into your skin deeper. We use the tape pat because we usually have medical support handy to remove said material. Beta particles on the other hand are pretty nasty and leave some vicious "burns". They are still so hot, that they are still producing quite a large quantity of X-ray and Neutron radiation, so they are just killing cells, getting them off of you is a priority, knowing that it's there before it's too late is the hard part, Tape pat and medical are your best bet. The good part is that the stuff is so heavy that it cant usually move around, so it at least stays where it is, no breezes taking it across town like Alpha.
Transient or "Hard" radiation are another story. Gamma, Neutron, and X-Ray are all by products of nuclear material. You cant see it, smell it, or hear it. If you catch a pulse and see that "blue flash", just grab a good bottle of Scotch Whisky pull off your mask, have a seat, and relax, it won't be long. We joke about this in our teams SOP. "The contaminated individual is required to step into a contamination collection bag and hand out all personal items for decon, then all government property for reissue, load pistol and ensure that assistant has control of the lanyard, fill out own hazardous material shipping label and hand to assistant, pull bag over head and use pistol, ensuring trajectory of bullet will not exit contamination control bag. Assistant then removes and safes pistol for decon, applies label and seals bag, repeat as necessary." Gallows humor, gotta love it.
Seriously, if you get a good pulse, all those little pocket detectors are good for is letting you know it, because when you're bit, then you're bit, end of story. As stated, find some train tracks and look for the pretty blue train to step in front of. The positive side is that you pretty much need a "Magic Mushroom Maker" to produce significant(fatal) ammounts of "hard" energy, not to many of those out there thank goodness. An RDD, or Radiation Dispersal Device (dirty bomb) is just a device to spread the particulate contamination around. They are more hype than most think, fairly small area, and not that much dirty material leads to news panic and only a couple hundred contaminated people. Not much in the grand scheme. Not panicking, and going through decon as soon as possible will save one nine times out of ten. If you inhaled any particulat, just be glad they have made some wonderful advances in cancer research lately. If you want to see why you need to step in the way of that train, I have copies of the pictures from the accident in Los Alamos during the "Manhattan" project. I'll send them to you, but I won't post them, they are pretty graphic. Basically, a ball park frank in the microwave!
"The old father wove the skein of your life long ago, hide in a hole if you like, you won't live one second longer"
Have a nice day folks!
_________________________
"There is no human problem that cannot be solved with an appropriate quantity of High Explosives!"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65377 - 05/10/06 05:52 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/15/05
Posts: 2485
Loc: California
|
Not to minimize the danger faced by first responders here who will put their lives on the line if something like this ever occurs, but for your average Joe Citizen, I would say that the dangers of radiation from a dirty bomb, another Chernobyl type accident, etc. are very overhyped. Now, if a nuclear bomb actually detonated, that's all she wrote. And if I were a fire fighter or doing hazmat and a dirty bomb went off, then I would gear up with everything I could, including the kitchen sink, but I'm not a first responder. Just trying to give a Big Picture perspective to the discussion here. The danger of a dirty bomb is mostly psychological, not physical. Putting aside the first question of "Well, what's the actual chance of a dirty bomb going off anywhere in the US?", then there's the question of what the damaging health effects would be? I see that you've done some reading from credible sources, like the CDC, about how experts think you should respond. And it all sounds frighteningly dangerous, but if you read medical literature that describes the actual risk involved, you'll probably be surprised that even if a dirty bomb went off right in your own city and you walked around in the stuff, on average, you're still more likely to die while driving or crossing the street or from your Happy Meal-a-day diet than from anything associated with the dirty bomb. There's plenty of credible info accesible on the web. Here's just one article on the dangers of plutonium from some of our friendly neighborhood experts over at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster was just a couple weeks ago. There's been an incredible amount of research into the health effects of that event, particularly in the most affected areas in Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus. And you know what? Except for a small but detectable increase in childhood thyroid cancers (the majority treatable, by the way), there's no detectable increase in cancer or leukemia above the background noise of all the other reasons people die of every year, including the usual assortment of cancers. I'm not saying that radiation doesn't cause cancer or doesn't kill or doesn't burn your skin or doesn't have any health effects--I'm saying that when taking a bird's eye look on all these millions of people who were directly and indirectly exposed to radiation from Chernobyl--some close, some farther away--there's little to see. "Only" 28 workers died from acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and about 125 diagnosed with ARS in the immediate aftermath of that disaster. And over 600,000 workers (called "liquidators") actually worked on the clean up over the years. And even among these people, the vast, vast majority of them are still going to die from the usual stuff. If you're interested in some summaries of the research done about the effects of Chernobyl, go to the International Atomic Energy Agency's website , you can find links to the IAEA's summary of the Chernobyl disaster, and a link to the WHO's 2006 report on the topic. A lot of good stuff in there. So, in reality, sheltering in place at home or at work with the ventilation/air conditioning off for a relatively short while until the fallout settles or is dispersed will significantly reduce your already small risk of ever being negatively affected by a dirty bomb blast. Leave the lead-lined suit to Superman to protect him from kryptonite.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65378 - 05/10/06 06:38 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Very well founded post.
As emergency workers, we carry personal dosimeters in a disaster scenario. The dose limit per year is 200 millisieverts (mSv), which translates to about half a chest X-ray. For actual disasters, we've agreed on a dose of two sieverts, which (statistically speaking) causes rad poisoning in 2.something percent of healthy individuals if said radiation is absorbed within ten minutes. This is of course only if human lives are in danger. Otherwise, we foam the hell out of the area (to keep dust down), keep people away, and wait until the radiation either dies down or until the Army shows up.
Our protective suits are standard hazmat suits. They offer very little beta-, and no gamma- or neutron radiation protection, but a quick high-pressure was cleans them nicely, so you can get out of the suit in relative safety. Actual danger is minimal, the digital dosimeters have various alarm limits so we can leg it in time if we have to.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65379 - 05/10/06 07:37 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/15/05
Posts: 2485
Loc: California
|
Thank you. I just hope that people understand that I'm not saying that a dirty bomb is not a danger, but just to keep it in perspective and in relation to your situation. I was just reading from the IAEA report I mentioned. It says that on average, residents living in areas of "strict radiological control" close to Chernobyl received about 50 mSv or more in total over 20 years. (Of course, emergency workers had far higher exposures) So that's well below your annual limit of 200 mSv. In spite of this nuclear disaster that released a tremendous amount of radiation and radioactive material into the environment, the actual radiation dose over 20 years, even living near the reactor, was very minimal. Now, compare Chernobyl to the radioactive potential inside a "suitcase" dirty bomb. Danger certainly exists for emergency workers responding to a dirty bomb, but the risk for someone like me, not affected by the initial explosive blast? Like I said, the danger is more psychological than physical.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65380 - 05/10/06 11:00 PM
Re:Potassium Iodide for Radiation Poisoning
|
Registered: 09/04/05
Posts: 417
Loc: Illinois
|
Potasium iodide has never been in the picture at any of the outages I've been to... exposure levels aren't that high. I don't know enough about it's use to answer your question, but I'd bet that it's more of a (I'll be OK, I've got these pills) last ditch/last hope type of thing to build SOME level of false security... if I"m going to die from massive cancer, I'd just as soon get it over with right now... which brings us back to the train(chuckle, snicker).
And yes, decon is the first step... clean it up so you don't spread it around.
Troy
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65381 - 05/11/06 01:22 PM
Re:Potassium Iodide for Radiation Poisoning
|
Enthusiast
Registered: 01/12/04
Posts: 265
Loc: Stafford, VA, USA
|
KI pills are designed to saturate the thyroid (Iodine uptake) to avoid it taking in one of the radioacitve isotopes instead during an airborne event, that's all. No other benefit other than that; preventive.
Regards, Bill (former submarine officer)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65382 - 05/11/06 08:13 PM
Re:Potassium Iodide for Radiation Poisoning
|
Registered: 09/04/05
Posts: 417
Loc: Illinois
|
'Bout what I figured, that's why they're not (common) at the big tea kettles...If things are bad enough to have to "Med Up", I'm gonna drag up <img src="/images/graemlins/shocked.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/images/graemlins/ooo.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />, thanks for the clarification <img src="/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />
Troy
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65383 - 05/12/06 06:07 PM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/12/04
Posts: 1204
Loc: Nottingham, UK
|
> Now, if a nuclear bomb actually detonated, that's all she wrote.
I think that depends on how far away it is. My understanding is that there are some radiation scenarios where shelter-in-place makes sense, and where a gadget to tell you when it is safe to go outside would be useful.
Generally, the nastier the fallout the shorter its half-life, so we are probably talking about sheltering for a couple of weeks.
_________________________
Quality is addictive.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#65384 - 05/14/06 04:52 AM
Re: The Uneasy Topic of Radiation Poisoning
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/15/05
Posts: 2485
Loc: California
|
I tuned into the tail end of 20/20 last night and John Stossel's segment caught my attention because he was talking about the ultimate health impact of Chernobyl (I think he refers to the same IAEA report that I did in an earlier post). Overall, the 20/20 segment's topic was the "myth" that radiation is bad for you (20/20's choice of words, not mine). A webcast of that segment isn't available, but the transcript can be read here. Anyway, just more food for thought.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
0 registered (),
894
Guests and
20
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|