Thanks for the links, Frenchy.
The one I have is reviewed there under yet another name... LOL
MVP EverlightThe test there, which is a tad more scientific than me walking around the house in the dark, is pretty consistant with what I noticed. LOL
As an aside...
Does the reviewer often go to great lengths to test a light and then drop the rating because of things that weren't tested, but were "reported" (or in this case not even reported in the light in question but reported in similar lights)?
It seems to me to be somewhat similar to a movie reviewer going to see a movie, reporting that it was great, mentioning that other people hated it, and in the end giving it a bad review (or in this case liking a movie but giving it a bad review because he doesn't particulary like the genre). LOL
I can understand bringing up concerns about one type of flashlight or another based on the class of light and common problems that some might have, and I would certainly take such a warning into consideration especially when voiced by someone I would consider to be somewhat of an expert. However, to downgrade a rating in such a manner seems a bit unfair.
I already have the light, so this particular review is moot as far as purchasing one based on said review is concerned... Eh, I still like the light so far, so I guess it doesn't matter... LOL