#51304 - 10/05/05 10:24 PM
No evacuation from San Francisco
|
Registered: 10/05/05
Posts: 21
|
Hi all,
I always knew it would be tough to evacuate San Francisco in the event of a big earthquake. But, the havoc caused when folks tried to evacuate Houston really opened my eyes. There are only three ways of getting out of the city: north over the Golden Gate Bridge, east over the Bay Bridge and south through the peninsula. The drivers around here aren't the best. The first rain produces dozens of accidents and it only takes a couple to stop all traffic on the freeway. In additon, USGS predicts hundreds of road closures in the event of a major earthquake. So, I think trying to evacuate would be impractical for me (YMMV). Bay Area people outside San Francisco would have it easier, but it would be at least as bad as Houston during Rita.
Anyone given any thought to what you would do in an urban environment, in the event of a major earthquake, when your house in uninhabitable? Everyone's learned that going to a shelter is a BAD IDEA. I've thought about just grabbing my wife, dogs, food, water and backpacking gear, and camping out in Golden Gate Park.
BTW, it appears that almost all of the New Orleans reports of sniping, rapes and murders were wild rumors. People helped each other out as best they could. I know all my neighbors and people around here are pretty cool. I would need to be careful. Every place has bad guys!
Thanks!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#51306 - 10/05/05 11:25 PM
Re: No evacuation from San Francisco
|
new member
Registered: 03/23/02
Posts: 54
Loc: ca
|
I live in Los Angeles and have concluded that evacuation will be near impossible after a quake since our freeways are gridlocked during a normal day. Collapsed overpasses will impede almost all freeways leaving only limited surface roads. And how could the surrounding areas absorb up to several million people?
Several years ago I purchased a large tent, about 10' x 15' on sale at Costco. Not a perfect solution, but it gives me the option of setting up a tent in my large back yard if my house collapses. You might consider buying a large tent from a hunting supplies catalogue. Not a perfect solution but an option.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#51307 - 10/06/05 12:19 AM
Re: No evacuation from San Francisco
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 3824
|
Evacuation, or the popular phrase 'bugging out' implies A. ready egress and B. destination. S.F. will probably retain physical links through helicopter and limited marine traffic. Without knowing any plans, I would hazard the closed NAS Alameda would become a major staging area. I would begin by assembling a kit and setting up a block group among your nieghbors. A central phone number outside of the disaster area you can get through to should be used to assure any and all relatives and friends of your group about your status. Phone lines are going to be overtaxed also. Have you done a safety inventory of your residence? Are major appliances and furniture strapped down, a wrench to secure the gas handy? All preparations will be for naught if you are injured or worse in the initial quake.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#51308 - 10/06/05 01:23 AM
Re: No evacuation from San Francisco
|
Registered: 10/05/05
Posts: 21
|
Hi Chris,
All good suggestions. The Loma Prieta earthquake was my first wake-up call. Now the house is bolted to the foundation, wrench hanging near the gas shut-off valve, basic 5 day survival kit in place, etc. Before Katrina, I thought this is a big country with hugh resources, so the State and Federal government would come to our rescue. Like others in this group, I'm doing a major rethink. A lot of my assumptions were way off.
Lynn
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#51309 - 10/06/05 03:06 AM
Re: No evacuation from San Francisco
|
Journeyman
Registered: 09/19/05
Posts: 56
|
Not only is there no chance of evacuating from the Bay Area due to the size of the population, there aren’t too many places to go to that could support the mass of unprepared people. I’m a long time resident, and the only sane plan is to shelter at home. My only “bug-out” type of preparation will be to insure that if I am stuck at work when the “Big One” hits, that I will have sufficient supplies to make it home somehow. I will probably keep a mountain bike locked up in the back of my truck. I always have basic supplies with me. I stay in good enough shape where I could walk home (25 miles) if I absolutely had to do so. Earthquakes are the only real threat where I live. Wind would carry any bad stuff to the East of where I live should there be a terrorist event. All of the refineries are East of my house. I am high enough where a Tsunami is extremely unlikely. Other than an Asteroid strike, Earthquakes are the only threat.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#51310 - 10/06/05 03:51 AM
Re: No evacuation from San Francisco
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
If you think it's bad in San Francisco, try living in the lower mainland of British Columbia. At least you guys have a military, Coast Guard and National Guard to help out in times of disaster. Here in Canada, we've neglected our military to the point that it's almost non-existent. Our Coast Guard is hopeless and we don't have anything like a National Guard. The only significant military presence in Canada is on the other side of the Rocky Mountains, so when the big one strikes here, we are truly on our own. Oh yea, I forgot to mention that we don't have any heavy air lift capability either.
The official plan is to actually truck troops and equipment across the Rockies to provide aid to British Columbia in the event of an earth quake. Nobody mentions what will happens if there's a blizzard in the mountains when the earth quake strikes BC.
Everyone out here knows that the first troops to arrive here won't be Canadian, they'll be American.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#51311 - 10/06/05 04:17 AM
Re: No evacuation from San Francisco
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#51312 - 10/06/05 04:29 AM
Re: No evacuation from San Francisco
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 3824
|
I attended a seminar which included Captain Paul Watson of Sea Shepherd. A canadian marine fisheries representative tried to belittle his competence to command a large vessel, which Watson is indeed well qualified under canadian maritime regulations. The withering retort listing his campaigns against pirate whalers and fishing vessels against canadian navy and coast guard efforts was almost funny were it not so sad. Hang in there Paul. Just open a Molsen and play Stan Rodgers 'Rise Again' in hopes of a better future <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#51313 - 10/06/05 08:07 AM
Re: No evacuation from San Francisco
|
Rapscallion
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 02/06/04
Posts: 4020
Loc: Anchorage AK
|
If you're in SF, what about putting out to sea? There are plenty of boats and such in the bay, and I have to think that once clear of the entrance, you could scurry up or down the coast and escape a major portion of the exodus. Yeah, I am sure there are pitfalls with that idea too. If you don't happen to own a boat, I am sure comandeering one from some unprepared party wouldn't be too hard, given that the gen pop there has been duly disarmed.
Then again, there's that darned Airscooter. Anyone got a spare $55K? What a handy way to get 250 miles away from the zone of desperation.
_________________________
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools. -- Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
0 registered (),
886
Guests and
0
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|