Great responses!

I felt the plan was sorely inadequate, but comments here have reminded me of some things. For instance, this plan, last reviewed in 1997 was before Columbine, 9/11, more recently Katrina/Rita.

My dear wife saw me typing the original post and told me I was obsessed, and that their plan was good enough. I asked, "So what are they going to do when they have a non-specific bomb threat to the campus? The threat is made, but the location given is 'somewhere' on the campus. What are they going to do then?" She replied, "well, they'll get some buses and get the kids out of there."

My response, "Where will they get the buses from? Don't you think the buses that the school district uses will be occupied getting the kids in the lab school out?" I added, "Look what happened in NO...all those retirement homes had plans to evac including contracted buses, but they were all the same companies and not enough buses to go around!"

She shook her head and walked away.

She may think I'm crazy, but I'm going to pursue this further, using some of the ideas y'all have posted.

Keep 'em coming! <img src="/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

And regarding the New Madrid fault...I had a teacher in high school that sold insurance on the side and we all thought he was crazy to carry earthquake insurance...but that fault might be coming due any time now...maybe not so crazy!