My POINT was not "nasty", my point was that he brushed off a possible source of supply.

If I were to translate CK's response, it would be something like this: "Oh, dear, someone responding to a 4-yr-old question again. This SO interferes with my current endeavors and train of thought. I'm sure you don't have anything to offer us, so why don't you go somewhere else and play."

FACT: D.R. sometimes has trouble finding what he is looking for.

FACT: Someone offered to help find needed items and was blown off.

A slight case of tunnel vision?

Sue