Uh, yeah... whatever you say.

Back on non-tinfoil topic: the author implies quite strongly that John Kerry would be a better president than Bush because Kerry had been under fire and therefore would have the skills to act better under pressure. Kerry's Vietnam exploits and 20+ year Senate career are enough to refute this claim.

More specifically, however, day-to-day coverage of the Kerry campaign by Time and Newsweek (revealed only after the election) showed Kerry as a nail-biting ninny who was notorious AMONG HIS OWN STAFF for not being able to make decisions in a timely and strong manner. His personnel described over & over how they wanted to pull their hair out as Kerry polled & focus-grouped every micro-level decision, unable to move forward under the power of his own convictions.

Of all the detractions aimed at Bush, indecisiveness is not among them. Like I said, the author's digs against Bush are B.S.