Agree. If any here have read an aircraft incident report, the primary intent is to determine what/who failed (aircraft or pilots) and why so that future incidents can maybe be avoided. The incidents I've read have been brutally honest; they aren't intended to make people (survivors/relatives) feel good, they're intended to save lives. Why learn by your own mistakes when you can learn from the mistakes of those who have already beaten that path. Maybe we should model our comments to be more like what the NTSB would write. But for that you need hard facts and very little unsupported supposition.