I find it amazing what governments will try to do to keep their subjects disarmed. We're talking stun guns folks. I'm sure a criminal here and there may have used one, but the great majority are used by honest citizens to defend themselves. They are basically harmless. Maybe they create some pain and incapacitation for a few minutes (it's debatable how effective they are), but not lethal or causing permanent harm. There is no reason for government to take them away from people. I'm glad the courts apparently recognized that in this case. But the government is already responding to that by trying to stack the courts to do their bidding to disarm everyone. It's sad. People have a right to defend themselves - be that with stun guns, knives, firearms, or whatever.