Teslinhiker, I hope my post didn't come across the wrong way. I think you made some good points and I wasn't trying to pick on your comments in particular. I'm simply making some general observations in hope it contributes somehow to the discussion at hand.
It is just a TV show so trying to read too much into it might not really be worth the effort. But personally, I can say "Alone" has been of the more interesting shows to follow. Granted, it is closer to "rough camping" than real survival as the more cynical minds among us might say.
But then, the same could be said about Les Stroud.
However, that does not in any way detract from the basic premise IMHO. Going out into the woods with little gear and no food to see how long one can last is to my mind foremost a controlled experiment rather than a true survival situation. Still, it is an interesting and highly demanding test of skill. Maybe "Alone" isn't quite what it's made out to be. Perhaps I'm naive, but so far it didn't seem outright staged. Were the participants cheating? I'm not sure, they seemed genuinely hard pressed and losing something like 20+lbs in a month shows pretty clearly that they were getting no outside support as far as food. So the show reminds me a lot of Les Stroud, who I'd rate among the few "real" experts in the world of "survival" TV. But again, to each his own. YMMV.
As far as Joe, I have checked the first three episodes once again. The way I see it the story goes like this:
Episode 1: Joe moves from the shore toward higher ground looking for a better campsite. About an hour later, going through difficult terrain, he finds a game trail and more open ground where he builds a tarp shelter in the late afternoon.
Episode 2: Joe spends Day 2 at the shelter but is unable to find firewood or food, hence his idea to go looking for a beach on Day 3 at 9:58 AM. At 10:31 he is scouting the area along the river bank and is confronted by a bear. He returns back to camp, packs his gear and starts moving. At 4:54 PM he finds the beach.
Taken at face value, I see nothing inherently wrong with that timeline. Running into the bear around 10:31 AM Joe decides to get straight back to the camp, which is evidently close by. It takes him maybe an hour to pack his stuff, so he could well be on his way around noon.
At a first glance, the editing does make it seem as if he only started moving at 2:22 PM. However, note that whenever the story moves to another participant the sequence starts with an introductory shot and reference time displayed on the screen. That particular time does not necessarily refer to the starting point of the sequence but more like somewhere in the middle of the scene. Confusing perhaps but necessary if you need to condense several hours of slow paced action into a short video sequence.
Anyway, supposing Joe sets off around 12:00 that gives him plenty of time to cover some distance. At 2:22 PM he is somewhere along a stream climbing up toward higher ground. He is filmed at the beach at 4:54 PM. Joe is clearly very happy now that he's found a good spot "after so much hiking" uphill and downhill "with all his gear".
Just how far the beach was from the original landing zone I can't really tell from the show. But looking at the maps in Episode 1 (at 27:18) and Episode 3 (at 11:43) his location doesn't seem to have changed much, which is a little odd. I wonder if the location markers on that map are really accurate.