#273419 - 12/29/14 12:32 AM
sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
|
Stranger
Registered: 01/11/14
Posts: 6
Loc: Ontario
|
Hello everyone,
Quick question. I'm looking into getting an emergency communication device for a wide spread power outage.
Which service would you recommend? Spot, Delorme inReach, or a true satellite phone.
It will only be for very rare usage (unless comms go out here).
And are there small ham radios capable of Dxing yet? I haven't kept up to date with current tech!
I apologize that this post is likely opening a can of worms.
Yours truly, James
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273420 - 12/29/14 12:49 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: Ontario]
|
Geezer in Chief
Geezer
Registered: 08/26/06
Posts: 7705
Loc: southern Cal
|
In recent power outages here (SoCal) the good ol' land line phone has continued to function...and its cheap!
_________________________
Geezer in Chief
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273424 - 12/29/14 05:01 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: chaosmagnet]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5359
Loc: SOCAL
|
Location and geography would help too.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273426 - 12/29/14 11:02 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: chaosmagnet]
|
Stranger
Registered: 01/11/14
Posts: 6
Loc: Ontario
|
Threats: Mostly large scale / geological area power failures. The more independent the better.
Budget: $600 Max.
Multipurpose: Hope to be able to send txt messages when I'm out hiking in remote locations as an added useful bonus.
Location: Sudbury Ontario with camping trips to fly in locations throughout North/Ontario.
Hikermor Landlines did work during the massive power failure of ten years ago, but I'd like an additional layer of comms.
Ham would be ideal, but to Dx you always needed a car-size setup.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273428 - 12/29/14 05:11 PM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: chaosmagnet]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5359
Loc: SOCAL
|
I need more to do more research, but at a glance, the DeLorme InReach - Goal Zero package is compelling. Not necessarily buying the package from DeLorme, but the capability of that package. I already have a Goal Zero Solar panel with USB output for charging.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273429 - 12/29/14 11:29 PM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: chaosmagnet]
|
Stranger
Registered: 01/11/14
Posts: 6
Loc: Ontario
|
http://www.mec.ca/product/5035-992/spot-global-phone/?q=satellite%2Bphone
MEC has a satellite phone for $499 $25 per month.
My concern is that all of these option require a base station somewhere on earth. No power at the base station means no relayed messages.
Thoughts?
Sounds like ham still isn't portable enough for my needs.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273431 - 12/30/14 03:47 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: Ontario]
|
Sheriff
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 12/03/09
Posts: 3857
Loc: USA
|
My concern is that all of these option require a base station somewhere on earth. No power at the base station means no relayed messages. Not much in the way of options beyond ham radio and systems that rely on terrestrial phone or data switches.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273442 - 01/01/15 04:57 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: Ontario]
|
Veteran
Registered: 08/31/11
Posts: 1233
Loc: Alaska
|
My concern is that all of these option require a base station somewhere on earth. No power at the base station means no relayed messages. Perhaps you should consider carrier pigeons? 
_________________________
"Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas any more." -Dorothy, in The Wizard of Oz
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273448 - 01/01/15 03:48 PM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: AKSAR]
|
Geezer in Chief
Geezer
Registered: 08/26/06
Posts: 7705
Loc: southern Cal
|
My concern is that all of these option require a base station somewhere on earth. No power at the base station means no relayed messages. Perhaps you should consider carrier pigeons? Indeed! They worked on the battlefields of WW I a century ago, so why not now? You could also consider heliographs; they brought Geronimo to his knees in the late 19th century. They did require land based stations, but those are easy to establish.
Edited by hikermor (01/01/15 03:51 PM)
_________________________
Geezer in Chief
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273477 - 01/03/15 08:49 PM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: AKSAR]
|
Stranger
Registered: 01/11/14
Posts: 6
Loc: Ontario
|
I have three carrier pigeons already ....and they're OK I suppose. They really can stuff into very small cages, but they don't mention the smell of their poo. I mean you just can't stuff the cage in the top of your backpack, even if the 'stuff' doesn't fall out (or get flicked out by the stupid birds...god knows they like doing that) the smell is horrible. It gets into absolutely everything! I know, I know, I've tried starving them a bit, and that does work on short outings, but they'll eventually need to be fed and you risk weakening them so much they won't make the homing flight. My real issue with them is that I can't get a return message. Stupid, stupid birds. Heliographs are a possibility, but if I'm injured at the base of the mountain it really sucks to have to crawl up the mountain to use the heliograph. I simply won't do that again. I won't. Great suggestions guys. I'm leaning towards an inreach se as it is only $11 per month coupled with a http://www.qrpkits.com/survivor.htmlI have no affiliation with either of the above. -Ontario
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273480 - 01/04/15 02:39 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: Ontario]
|
Geezer in Chief
Geezer
Registered: 08/26/06
Posts: 7705
Loc: southern Cal
|
Heliographs are a possibility, but if I'm injured at the base of the mountain it really sucks to have to crawl up the mountain to use the heliograph. I simply won't do that again. I won't.
Let the sun's rays do the walking! During the Geronimo campaign, the main station was in the center of the Ft. Bowie (AZ) parade ground. Messages were flashed to the summit of Bowie Peak, immediately south, and then relayed to other summits in the network (like present day Heliograph Peak). Labor intensive, but it worked. Signal mirrors are still a very effective signaling device - light, cheap, and easy (during daylight hours, anyway).
_________________________
Geezer in Chief
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273481 - 01/04/15 05:10 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: hikermor]
|
Newbie
Registered: 08/29/06
Posts: 41
Loc: the last bastion of PHRASECENS...
|
I tried looking into a landline for my mother but had no idea how to go about it anymore.
_________________________
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273548 - 01/07/15 02:43 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: chaosmagnet]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5359
Loc: SOCAL
|
Chaos -- I just noticed the Yaesu VX-8DR. Didn't know there was a 50MHz ham band. What kind of distance can you get in low VHF?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273577 - 01/08/15 01:55 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: Ontario]
|
"Be Prepared"
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 06/26/04
Posts: 2211
Loc: NE Wisconsin
|
I have three carrier pigeons already ....and they're OK I suppose. We had a tired carrier pigeon show up in our barn a number of years back. We figured it out by the band on its leg, called a phone number from its web site and they sent a local carrier pigeon breeder to pick it up, nurse it back to health, and make sure it got back to its owner. I was more than impressed with the whole thing and especially their desire to take care of that tired little bird. From my own experience amateur radio is the route to go. While I'm not a ham, my father spent lots of time working with local ham clubs that provided communications during simulated emergencies. Hams I know around here do the same thing. I would suppose that these communications focused on urgent communications.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#273579 - 01/08/15 05:14 AM
Re: sat phone VS spot VS Delorme inReach
[Re: KenK]
|
Sheriff
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 12/03/09
Posts: 3857
Loc: USA
|
I would suppose that these communications focused on urgent communications. My experience has been that once the emergency and urgent message traffic have been sent on, your local hams will work your lower-priority messages with a smile.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
0 registered (),
395
Guests and
100
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|