#260744 - 05/21/13 07:26 PM
Hot weather boots - really any different?
|
Old Hand
Registered: 08/10/06
Posts: 882
Loc: Colorado
|
I've been looking at boots and thinking about getting a pair of hot weather boots for hot weather use.
But, are they really very much cooler than old-fashioned leather army boots?
Seems like they might be worse in that the ones I've handled in the stores seem to be just as thickly insulated as the chinese import "combat" boots (Converse) I already have which turn my feet to soft soggy messes even in cool weather.
My feet seem happier in full leather than nylon. Even street shoes vs sneakers gives me drier feet.
Advice or experience please?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260750 - 05/21/13 08:42 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: unimogbert]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 745
Loc: NC
|
Jungle boots? Mainly canvas with leather lowers. Tough to find now that they have been phased out, but surplus places may still have them. Even better if you can get them modified, as in removing the steel plate in the sole for weight saving.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260752 - 05/21/13 08:51 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: unimogbert]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 11/25/08
Posts: 1918
Loc: Washington, DC
|
Since the late-1990s, I've been doing 10-13 mile hikes in the muggy Shenandoah National Park (Virginia) in temps well into the 90s wearing Lowe Renegades (Gore-tex).
In the winter, the same boots coupled with Gore-tex gaiters have kept my feet warm and dry in feet of snow.
I've lost track of how many pairs of Lowe Renegades I've owned -- currently have three pair.
In regard to hiking boots, the only thing I vary between the seasons is socks.
.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260753 - 05/21/13 09:22 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: Dagny]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5357
Loc: SOCAL
|
LOL, IMO it is the socks.
I've worn flight boots in Virginia Beach during July (hot and muggy) with Smartwool liners and light wool outer socks and my feet did not get clammy. 6 months later I wear the same socks in PNW but with a pair of Danner Rainforest boots and again, felt great. Make sure your socks are right before you start experimenting with boots. $.02
_________________________
Better is the Enemy of Good Enough. Okay, what’s your point??
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260756 - 05/21/13 09:48 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: unimogbert]
|
Veteran
Registered: 10/14/08
Posts: 1517
|
After 24 years of wearing Army boots, I never did like any of them. The jungle boots never lasted long, and my feet sweat easily in any boot in any weather. I found all leather, high quality hiking boots the best for me year round. I agree on the socks. They make a huge difference. I were Smartwool or other similar (all the outdoor companies market their own now) socks. Wool is the only thing that seems to work for my feet, in any weather.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260761 - 05/21/13 10:51 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: gonewiththewind]
|
Geezer in Chief
Geezer
Registered: 08/26/06
Posts: 7705
Loc: southern Cal
|
I agree, socks are key. Thorlo is a brand that works for me. I prefer as low a boot as possible, generally a combination fabric and leather. Approach shoes are versatile and generally what I wear most often.
Military boots did not work for me, with the exception of Nam boots.
Edited by hikermor (05/22/13 12:29 AM)
_________________________
Geezer in Chief
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260803 - 05/22/13 02:54 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: Herman30]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5357
Loc: SOCAL
|
Yep, here in SOCAL I can get buy with my casual wear running shoes (New Balance mostly mesh uppers) all year simply changing socks to deal with temperature variations. 1/4 height coolmax socks during the warm months and the same Smartwool liners and outer socks I wear in my boots during the winter. If rain is in the forecast I may switch to my Vasque Breeze hiking boots and for these I lose the liners because they can't handle that extra layer.
_________________________
Better is the Enemy of Good Enough. Okay, what’s your point??
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260865 - 05/23/13 01:29 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: unimogbert]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 08/10/06
Posts: 882
Loc: Colorado
|
I guess I didn't explain completely enough what I was looking for.
When I go "hiking" I wear great boots (Vasque) and 2 pr of socks and haven't had blisters with those boots or socks in decades even up to 14 mile dayhikes.
But I've also had combat boots as working-around-the-house and shorter hikes boots. While they are kind of hard underfoot I haven't had problems with the all leather versions. (Sweated so hard on one hike I had white sweat rings around the ankles of one pair.)
I get soggy feet with the thick cordura and suede version of combat boots.
So my question is whether the so-called hot weather boots are just khaki colored versions of the same thing that gives me wet feet or they are actually different and cooler/drier.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260866 - 05/23/13 02:34 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: unimogbert]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 02/05/10
Posts: 776
Loc: Northern IL
|
I find the "jungle" boots to be pretty comfy. The soles and heels of them tend to be pretty soft and wear out quite fast, especially when worn on pavement.
I both like and hate the drains on them. I never liked the idea of water seeping into the boot when I step in a shallow puddle, but the drains actually work pretty well at getting the water out.
The mostly fabric upper breathes well. My feet sweat but it is not a problem with this style of boots.
I wear nylon socks as liners and an outer wool/synthetic blend socks.
I like the protective sole plate in them as it helps deal with the bigger gravel chunks and other stuff that I occasionally step on. It spreads the impact out over a larger area. otherwise I feel it every time.
I like the nice ankle support too.
In fact, i just bought another pair. New old stock. labeled 4-97.
_________________________
Warning - I am not an expert on anything having to do with this forum, but that won't stop me from saying what I think. Bob
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#260877 - 05/23/13 06:14 PM
Re: Hot weather boots - really any different?
[Re: unimogbert]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 03/08/07
Posts: 2208
Loc: Beer&Cheese country
|
I guess I didn't explain completely enough what I was looking for.
When I go "hiking" I wear great boots (Vasque) and 2 pr of socks and haven't had blisters with those boots or socks in decades even up to 14 mile dayhikes.
But I've also had combat boots as working-around-the-house and shorter hikes boots. While they are kind of hard underfoot I haven't had problems with the all leather versions. (Sweated so hard on one hike I had white sweat rings around the ankles of one pair.)
I get soggy feet with the thick cordura and suede version of combat boots.
So my question is whether the so-called hot weather boots are just khaki colored versions of the same thing that gives me wet feet or they are actually different and cooler/drier. It seems that the cold weather boots, current issue, have gore tex liners and some sort of thinsulate type insulation. Thehot weather are usually justthe leather or leather/canvas similar to the old Nam boots. That being said, they dont feel as comfortable to me as the surplus boots did. As for socks, I just usethe refular white cotton crew socks for most everything. Occasionally smartwool if the temp is less than 40. Uniform socks when appropriate. But Ive hiked hundreds of miles, with few blisters, in crew socks.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
0 registered (),
890
Guests and
12
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|