The Glazers have always been tauted for the safety edge, low penetration through walls, doors, etc. However, several years back, I read an article in one of the gun magazines (I don't remember which one) that did a comparison shoot for effect on the target. For comparison, they shot a beef carcass at point blank range with a .410 shotgun and from 15 ft. with a Glazer .45 gov't. auto. and the wound cavities were almost identical. I was so impressed that I had to do some "field testing" myself, and afterwards, I was just as impressed. To this day, I have a clip full of Glazers for "things that go bump in the night". As far as the penetration (or lack thereof) I've never done any testing to back their claims, but I can say that it IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS than hard ball ammo. Bottom line... the round empties all of it's energy into the target, and in my opinion, a massive wound with little or no "through and through" ballistics is much more effective than a narrow channel running completely through a target that goes into shock and shoots back. For those of you who haven't already guessed, yes I am a big fan of the .45, and while I'd rather have a 9mm than a hand full of nothing, I don't want enything less than a .45 for defensive use, although, for anything under 30 yards, NOTHING beats a 12 guage pump.
Thanks for taking the time to read my rant, have a nice day <img src="images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
Troy