Thanks, Doug!

BTW, I understand and agree with your rationale behind using the manufacturers photos. But I must add that they truly don't compare to images you have supplied in the past. What I've always marveled at was how well you managed to capture critical components or functions in static images. The manufactures should point out how weel your photos work to their market staff. Sexy glossys may attract attention, but functional photos like yours help sell the true product benifts (unless the only benefit is being sexy and glossy <img src="images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> )

Thanks again