Originally Posted By: NightHiker
I'm honestly just trying to come up with an argument against having a third option for findings in a trial and was hoping you could give me some ideas to play with.


I am not trying to be a dope by what I say next. I think we would all be better served focusing on the unwanted fame aspect of the original post just to stay on point. However, we can always start a new discussion on the merits/history of our system of jurisprudence. It has been a GREAT conversation with excellent framing of arguments and opinions. I really appreciate the viewpoint of the citizens of other nations as they weigh in on this. Thanks everyone for an outstanding discussion.

Just me.
_________________________
"Its not a matter of being ready as it is being prepared" -- B. E. J. Taylor