#222347 - 04/26/11 07:50 PM
Re: Back up plan for poor cell phone coverage?
[Re: Roarmeister]
|
Sheriff
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 12/03/09
Posts: 3842
Loc: USA
|
Yep, a competitor's pp phone is a good idea but so is carrying/buying a phone card or carrying coins for regular old pay phones. I don't see a lot of payphones out there any more.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#222351 - 04/26/11 09:40 PM
Re: Back up plan for poor cell phone coverage?
[Re: Bingley]
|
INTERCEPTOR
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 07/15/02
Posts: 3760
Loc: TX
|
For what it's worth, my $10 Tracfone ( http://www.tracfone.com/) gets the best reception out in the wild of any phone I've seen, plus I don't have to worry about damaging an expensive object. -Blast
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#222383 - 04/27/11 07:32 AM
Re: Back up plan for poor cell phone coverage?
[Re: Aussie]
|
Veteran
Registered: 07/23/08
Posts: 1502
Loc: Mesa, AZ
|
[quote=Aussie Regarding a SPOT, these are great for (remote) tracking your progress or for a real emergency, however they are one-way communication. If you do set one off it can still be hours (or days – esp in bad weather) before help can reach you. If you did have phone coverage, you can get information about how long before rescue reaches you, and you can receive instructions about what to do. Any satellite communication (SPOT or phone) will be hampered by steep terrain, so if you’re in a canyon or deep valley you may not be able to get a signal out – but I guess that goes for a regular cell phone too ! [/quote] I don't like being a Sharpshooter Aussie but your statements above about SPOT2 are incorrect or a straw mans argument. SPOT2 is fully capable of working in deep canyons. HERE is one of many pages you can Google to refute that line of thinking. While SPOT2 is a one way communicator, it is a communicator with in a worst case environment 90%+ success rate for communication when there is no cell phone coverage. It is a straw mans argument to state it will take days for rescue when the fact is without communication, specifically cell phone coverage, there would be no notice of SOS for rescue. Standard Disclaimer for myself, but regardless if a person uses GlobalStar/SPOT or other PLB unit, it works when there is no cell phone coverage over 80% of the globe.
_________________________
Don't just survive. Thrive.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#222387 - 04/27/11 11:28 AM
Re: Back up plan for poor cell phone coverage?
[Re: comms]
|
Geezer in Chief
Geezer
Registered: 08/26/06
Posts: 7705
Loc: southern Cal
|
You have a lot of faith in a company that has experienced recent recalls of two of its products.
I have deep roots in the pre-electronics era,when Sir Galahad was not just around the corner, ready to ride to rescue at a moments notice. The emphasis then (if you were at all prepared) was on extricating your party from the fix they were in, and secondarily on contacting an outside agency for assistance.
I think that is still a pretty good protocol, because there is still a inevitable lag before rescuers can deal with your situation, and that time can be critical.
I chuckle when I think of receiving instructions over a cell phone: "See that box of matches? Reach inside and extract one of the sticks with the red blob on the end. Hold the stick firmly between the thumb and forefinger, red blob outward. Now forcefully move the red blob against the side of the matchbox where the scratchy stuff is... You do have some fire tinder, right?....."
_________________________
Geezer in Chief
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#222396 - 04/27/11 03:10 PM
Re: Back up plan for poor cell phone coverage?
[Re: Bingley]
|
"Be Prepared"
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 06/26/04
Posts: 2211
Loc: NE Wisconsin
|
I've had a PLB for a number of years - long enough for the battery life to become questionable. It has provided a lot of comfort to my family while out and about.
With the new upcoming tiny ACR model coming out for around $250, they've hit a price point where - at least for me - there is much less hesitance to make the purchase ... and it matches the cost of installing a new battery on my current older ACR model.
I'd just go with the PLB and not have to pay any ongoing service costs over the years, wonder whether you'll get reception when hell breaks loose, wonder if the phone will survive whatever happened, and KNOW that help will be able to find you even if you are truley lost ... or too injured to reliably give information. Its a pretty awesome technology.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#222398 - 04/27/11 04:20 PM
Re: Back up plan for poor cell phone coverage?
[Re: Bingley]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/15/05
Posts: 2485
Loc: California
|
Does anyone know the current status of the old TDMA/AMPS network in the US? AT&T had the single biggest chunk of that technology but the last time I have read anything about this topic a number of years ago, it sounded like they were agressively shutting those parts of it network down as quickly as it could while it built out its GSM capability. Haven't read about that in a long time. This is something that mostly affects those rural and out-of-the-way areas, but that's the OP's concern.
Are there even any analog pre-paid phones anymore? Tracphone used to be one, but haven't they switched to all CDMA handsets now?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#222438 - 04/28/11 03:21 AM
Re: Back up plan for poor cell phone coverage?
[Re: Bingley]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/12/10
Posts: 205
Loc: Australia
|
There are some good points here. I've only used a SPOT "original" (and Iridium sat phones) in my part of the world, and I'm Not saying it will "never work in canyons", but I have experienced limited coverage. I agree that virtually any satellite device will have far greater coverage that any phone network.
The claims in the article do make the SPOT2 seem quite a bit better than the original, and I’m impressed by the claimed 90% “delivery” for deep canyons in the Americas.
SPOT themselves claim: “in everyday conditions it is normal for some messages to be blocked by your environment, such as hills or buildings….. scheduled to automatically send multiple messages… [giving] overall reliability” I take it this means that it will keep retrying until it can actually send the message, so if you are in a canyon or similar the messages may not be sent until you reach a suitable piece of sky or a satellite positions itself above you, and then the messages can get out ?
I’m sure that (eventually) 90% plus of messages are “delivered”, but not necessarily 90% delivered “real time” ? This just means that your SOS message may not get set instantly. If you did 5 days of canyoning (as per the article) I guess people would go in and out of the narrows of the canyon and perhaps its then that their SPOT messages were sent (90%). But if you were stationary with a causality in the narrows of the canyon I wonder if the message would get out ? Of course no other device would work there either !
But I’m not really wanting to discuss canyoning – it is a fairly specific circumstance.
For general outdoor, open sky use SPOT or sat phone – no problem. In more confined, deep valleys, I have seen issues with original SPOT and do need to resend – it looks like SPOT2 automatically resends, so this is a real plus; and I have also had problems getting signal with my sat phone.
As Comms says the overall SPOT and PLB coverage is fantastic– I urge everyone to buy a SPOT or PLB or similar device and don’t leave home without it. (And don’t forget spare batteries/useby dates)
And I’m not saying “don’t get a SPOT or PLB”, just pointing out that EVERY technology does have some limitations even if most people may never encounter them.
That’s it !
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
1 registered (Herman30),
852
Guests and
21
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|