To play the devil's advocate, the key statement in the article you linked states:
Patients with the highest levels of the endocrine disruptor in their urine carried a 33% increased risk of coronary heart disease, a follow-up analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data showed.

However, this is NOT proof that the two are related. It could just as easily be something about the lifestyle of the test participants lead to both increased BPA concentrations and higher heart risks. The fact that they refer to the molecule in question as "endocrine disruptor" suggests that they are already biased, especially since no where in the article do they give any proof that the molecule had any effects whatsoever on the endocrine system.

Every food contains toxins, every action has risks.

-Blast