#221035 - 04/06/11 11:27 PM
Re: Is the LDS list to radical to digest?
[Re: ponder]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 05/05/07
Posts: 3601
Loc: Ontario, Canada
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#221045 - 04/07/11 12:55 AM
Re: Is the LDS list to radical to digest?
[Re: bacpacjac]
|
Geezer in Chief
Geezer
Registered: 08/26/06
Posts: 7705
Loc: southern Cal
|
I dunno, BPJ, I have a few problems with some of the things on the list, while others are right on. The biggest whopper is "store batteries in the freezer" - a very bad move. it isn't good for the batteries and takes space away from critical supplies like coffee ice cream.
For emergency use, I rely on lithium batteries - they have really good power, very long life, work well in cold, store for at least ten years, and are significantly lighter than alkalines. For daily use, I am phasing to quality rechargeables like Eneloops. I don't put alkaline batteries in anything I value.
I am amused at the list's reliance on second string suppliers like US Cavalry and Brigade Quartermaster. There are lots better sources out there - like good old REI for a lot of very decent basics, as well as many specialty sources.
I was glad to see that they did mention stocking reloading supplies in the firearms section. Fore me, that makes a lot of sense, and it is a rewarding pastime, to boot.
Again, some things are good, others are OK, and some are misses. Don't trust any one list.
_________________________
Geezer in Chief
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#221047 - 04/07/11 12:57 AM
Re: Is the LDS list to radical to digest?
[Re: ponder]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 01/28/10
Posts: 1174
Loc: MN, Land O' Lakes & Rivers ...
|
It's really a hijack, as the title of the thread asks a question, and we were discussing that. Anyway, here is the emergency prep list from Homeland Security for comparison
_________________________
The man got the powr but the byrd got the wyng
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#221058 - 04/07/11 02:28 AM
Re: Is the LDS list to radical to digest?
[Re: bacpacjac]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5357
Loc: SOCAL
|
You guys took frontsies to bacpacjac's link. That's not very polite. Ahh whatever, moving her link into spot #4 . . .
_________________________
Better is the Enemy of Good Enough. Okay, what’s your point??
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#221064 - 04/07/11 03:39 AM
Re: Is the LDS list to radical to digest?
[Re: Russ]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: 09/09/06
Posts: 323
Loc: Iowa
|
Oooops - my bad, should have looked through the thread a bit closer. Any input from bacpacjac can have precedence over my $0.02 worth any day.
- Eric
_________________________
You are never beaten until you admit it. - - General George S. Patton
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#221076 - 04/07/11 11:17 AM
Re: Is the LDS list to radical to digest?
[Re: ponder]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 11/09/06
Posts: 870
Loc: wellington, fl
|
Challenging the notion that faith literature is inappropriate for a 72 hour kit:
-survival in the medium to long term is arguably a group effort. Faith-based groups offer the occupational heterogeneity necessary to provide a wide and flexible communal skill-set.
-faith-based survival groupings have a shared set of values and behavioral norms that will promote inter-group harmony and ethical and merciful treatment of strangers.
-everybody believes in something: If the gospel according to Doug Ritter or Bear Grylls is reasonably included in a kit, why not include some of the older sacred texts?
-there is more to survival than building a fire.
-and if there is not more to survival than building a fire, faith literature makes dandy tinder.
I realize that the sheriff may nuke this, and I would understand it perfectly: faith literature might be the most hazardous of concealed weapons, and ccw has no place here...
_________________________
Dance like you have never been hurt, work like no one is watching,love like you don't need the money.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (rabbitroger),
872
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|