#220359 - 03/28/11 03:07 AM
Re: YOUR SKIRT IS TOO TIGHT!!!!
[Re: jzmtl]
|
Sheriff
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 10/12/07
Posts: 1804
Loc: Southern California
|
Yeah that's the problem, I need everything to fit inside the pot... Have you considered rolling the windscreen extension and placing it up against the walls of the pot? It can be rolled a bit tighter for storage and then loosened up for use. HJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#220393 - 03/28/11 05:29 PM
Re: YOUR SKIRT IS TOO TIGHT!!!!
[Re: jzmtl]
|
Addict
Registered: 03/18/10
Posts: 530
Loc: Montreal Canada
|
I suppose that'll work too, even though I tried to make this set up self contained. But since I don't need a full height screen, I want to figure out something that will attach to the Primus screen and only cover the gap. Still working on it.
Also looking into the possibility of switching the stove to Gigapower or crux, which seem to have a lower burner height and may work better without addition of screen.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#220417 - 03/28/11 10:17 PM
Re:Some testing of heat exchanger pot (eta power)
[Re: jzmtl]
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/14/09
Posts: 1419
Loc: Nothern Ontario
|
One thing I don't like about the Gigapower is lack of any real grip on the arms as compared to the Pocket Rocket. Pots do slip more easily off the Gigapower and nothing worse then seeing your dinner kiss the dirt if you are not real careful. I have seen this more then once with these stoves. Admittedly, it can happen with any stove though...
Also the height of the arms on the Gigapower are not much lower then the Pocket Rocket and I would surprised if it really would make any appreciable difference in cook/boil time to warrant the re-purchase of another stove. The Gigapower currently sells at MEC for $43.00. For that price, you can purchase 7 cannisters of Isopro for the Pocket Rocket and have hours of fuel burn time that would be very tough to beat, investment wise of only probable mere seconds of theoretical (and untested) extra burn time by the concept of the lower height arms on the Gigapower.
_________________________
Earth and sky, woods and fields, lakes and rivers, the mountain and the sea, are excellent schoolmasters, and teach some of us more than we can ever learn from books.
John Lubbock
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#220423 - 03/28/11 11:09 PM
Re:Some testing of heat exchanger pot (eta power)
[Re: jzmtl]
|
Addict
Registered: 03/18/10
Posts: 530
Loc: Montreal Canada
|
That's interesting regard the pot support, I just read another thread (on another forum) where people were complaining that pocket rocket's supports are slippery, and gigapower's support is better.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#220425 - 03/28/11 11:16 PM
Re:Some testing of heat exchanger pot (eta power)
[Re: jzmtl]
|
Geezer in Chief
Geezer
Registered: 08/26/06
Posts: 7705
Loc: southern Cal
|
I have been using a PR for over ten years - basically it has become my main, "go to" stove. I have not had any problem with alleged slippery supports. If you ask me there is a lot of nit-picking out there.
_________________________
Geezer in Chief
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#220426 - 03/28/11 11:20 PM
Re:Some testing of heat exchanger pot (eta power)
[Re: jzmtl]
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/14/09
Posts: 1419
Loc: Nothern Ontario
|
That's interesting regard the pot support, I just read another thread (on another forum) where people were complaining that pocket rocket's supports are slippery, and gigapower's support is better. I see a Mythbusters style of testing in the near future. Right Jim? (I nominate him as he has both types of stoves!)
_________________________
Earth and sky, woods and fields, lakes and rivers, the mountain and the sea, are excellent schoolmasters, and teach some of us more than we can ever learn from books.
John Lubbock
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#220435 - 03/28/11 11:56 PM
Re:Some testing of heat exchanger pot (eta power)
[Re: Teslinhiker]
|
Sheriff
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 10/12/07
Posts: 1804
Loc: Southern California
|
That's interesting regard the pot support, I just read another thread (on another forum) where people were complaining that pocket rocket's supports are slippery, and gigapower's support is better. I see a Mythbusters style of testing in the near future. Right Jim? (I nominate him as he has both types of stoves!) Well, maybe, if I can get the time. And what's the objective testing protocol? Perhaps angle of slope? But I've got something coming up that takes precedence over pot support "slipperyness" testing. My next gas project is to try to prove or disprove that the Soto Micro-regulator stove (OD-1R) has an advantage over conventional needle valved-stoves (Pocket Rocket, GST-100, etc.). That's going to take some planning and prep. God only knows what I'll find out, although I have my suspicions. HJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#220438 - 03/29/11 12:05 AM
Re:Some testing of heat exchanger pot (eta power)
[Re: Hikin_Jim]
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/14/09
Posts: 1419
Loc: Nothern Ontario
|
The Soto is bit pricey for a cannister stove and I don't know anyone who has one...which is uncommon in this area. For the cost (around $70.00) you would think that a better investment would be to purchase the Whisperlite for nearly the same price ($72.00 here.)
Anyway, looking forward to the comparison project.
_________________________
Earth and sky, woods and fields, lakes and rivers, the mountain and the sea, are excellent schoolmasters, and teach some of us more than we can ever learn from books.
John Lubbock
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#220443 - 03/29/11 12:38 AM
Re:Some testing of heat exchanger pot (eta power)
[Re: jzmtl]
|
Addict
Registered: 03/18/10
Posts: 530
Loc: Montreal Canada
|
Yeah eh? $70 is a bit too much for what I'd spend on a canister stove.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
0 registered (),
435
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|