#205053 - 07/23/10 11:31 PM
Re: UST WetFire Tinder - New vs. Old
[Re: cedfire]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: 02/13/09
Posts: 395
Loc: Connecticut, USA
|
I had some wetfire in clear popout packaged from when I was 10 or 12 (I'm 27) I found last year - totally worthless. The cellophane on top of the packages clearly let some air in. Boo. These new packages look better than the oldies.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#205059 - 07/24/10 12:02 AM
Re: UST WetFire Tinder - New vs. Old
[Re: roberttheiii]
|
Addict
Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 418
Loc: St. Petersburg, Florida
|
I have never used the WetFire for tinder, but I recently purchased a WetFire Stove (ultralight Ti three leg with a platform for the WetFire). Interesting little stove, but it would not even heat a pint of water in 72 degree weather and no wind. I was very disappointed. Maybe the new tablets are going to make the grade, especially if they have less smoke. (The pot was worse than a smokey wood fire.)
The best,
Jerry
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#205063 - 07/24/10 01:54 AM
Re: UST WetFire Tinder - New vs. Old
[Re: Hikin_Jim]
|
Addict
Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 418
Loc: St. Petersburg, Florida
|
HJ,
I tried the Esbit tabs and they work about as well as they do in an Esbit stove. The only problem is that there is no windbreak like the Esbit. I added a bit of aluminum foil for a windbreak and it works well at a LOT less weight (1.1 oz with the pouch and foil). Great for an emergency stove but not my taste for an everyday mugup. 8 to 10 min. for a pint of water to heat and plenty of crud on the pot (the stuff sack gets real dirty and it is easy to spread around). I'll keep the Pocket Rocket for every day, but we keep trying.
The best,
Jerry
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#205079 - 07/24/10 04:09 PM
Re: UST WetFire Tinder - New vs. Old
[Re: cedfire]
|
Addict
Registered: 07/06/03
Posts: 550
|
Once upon a time, a friend and I decided to go on a controlled trip to the mountains in the wet summer season and try out all the "survival" products we had accumulated, some since the Boy Scouting days. We learned a lot.
When it came to fire, we did not consider it a problem because we had so many "firestarters" along. We intended to cook on the fire and had no other means of cooking with us. So, we set up a tarp shelter, played around with various products and finally got to dinner time and time to start a fire. It had rained a slow steady rain all day and most wood was damp or real wet but we gathered and prepared enough wood for a nice fire and proceded to test our firestarting goodies. What a surprise, all the different products and not a single one worked, including the WetFire. Not sure how old they were, but for sure they were old and my friend had been carrying them in his PSK.
In fact some products would not even burn once a fire was started and the "firestarter" was thrown into the fire! What ended up working was a surprise as well. After much frustration we were about to walk a few miles back to the vehicle and pick up a backpacking stove to cook dinner on and I decided to try one last thing. I took pocket lint from some pocket and inside the pocket I had a bunch of Starburst candy wrappers which I had been eating all day, put that in the fire pit, sparked the lint with a Metalmatch and applied the Starburst wrappers. The waxed paper of the wrappers burned hot and burned a fairly long time. Our fire took off and we finally had dinner while discussing the useless items we had been depending on for decades and the possible outcome if needed in a real emergency.
Bottom line, always test things to be sure they really work, never trust just one method and always check items that have aged before taking them along and depending on them!
I now carry a variety of firemaking tools, all tested and checked. The Fire Fixin's kit is very good, the Vasoline/cotton balls works great (be sure they haven't dried out on you), waxpaper when wadded up is excellent as well. Simple is good! Cheers
_________________________
No, I am not Bear Grylls, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night and Bear was there too!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#205104 - 07/25/10 04:37 AM
Re: UST WetFire Tinder - New vs. Old
[Re: Hikin_Jim]
|
Addict
Registered: 07/06/03
Posts: 550
|
I don't think Tinder Qwik was available back then. We had things that were available back then and previously. Seems any product with wax or better yet, Bee's wax impegnated is pretty reliable for lighting and burning for a reasonable time. I carry a Spark-Lite with the Tinder Qwik in my packs as one of my firemaking options and consider them reliable. Check that the flint hasn't oxidized into dust in the Spark-Lite though. I have the aluminum model that I can remove and check/replace the flint. Well worth the extra few dollars!
_________________________
No, I am not Bear Grylls, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night and Bear was there too!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
0 registered (),
693
Guests and
22
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|