Another account with more detail:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100718/ap_on_re_us/us_state_park_shooting_12I severely doubt this, or any other event, will bring about restrictions.
But the historic record is pretty clear that cliques and drinking get violent as men buck for rank and position. If guns are present they get used and things go from busted noses and spitting teeth to bodies hauled off in bags.
No more true for handguns than any other potential weapon in the hands of criminals; bowling pins, hayforks, knitting needles, softball bats, box cutters.....
Related comments from John Lott, of the American Enterprise Institute:
"Lott: During state legislative hearings on concealed-handgun laws, possibly the most commonly raised concern involved fears that armed citizens would attack each other in the heat of the moment following car accidents. The evidence shows that such fears are unfounded. Despite millions of people licensed to carry concealed handguns and many states having these laws for decades, there has only been one case where a person with a permit used a gun after a traffic accident and even in that one case it was in self-defense.
Question: Violence is often directed at women. Won't more guns put more women at risk?
Lott: Murder rates decline when either more women or more men carry concealed handguns, but a gun represents a much larger change in a woman's ability to defend herself than it does for a man. An additional woman carrying a concealed handgun reduces the murder rate for women by about 3 to 4 times more than an additional man carrying a concealed handgun reduces the murder rate for men."