Alibris has a listing and prices seem reasonable:
http://www.alibris.co.uk/search/books/isbn/1853677302It is an interesting subject, but one that, as you noted, isn't strictly survival oriented.
Not survival oriented also in the simple observation that such attempts at armed resistance are, almost without exception, doomed. Resistance groups have essentially three major functions: Armed resistance, support of external forces and spying.
The French and Polish resistance as interdiction forces were systematically wiped out by the Germans in a few weeks. Free of restraint the German simply resorted to reprisals. Every time a German was killed or something blown up they would march into the nearest town and kill a suitable number of inhabitants. No trials or need to determine who was to blame. Just line them up and shoot them. It didn't take long before the resistance fighters were loathed almost as much by their countrymen as the Germans. Hunted by the occupiers and hated by their own people resources grew short and numbers dwindled.
The only places an active armed resistance lasted was where the area itself was left unoccupied and/or contested by another nation. Armed resistance existed behind the lines in Indonesia, Russia and China. The distance any resistance can operate is dependent on how far back covert communications or information and supplies can be maintained. In Russia it was usually just a few hundred miles and in areas bypassed by troops. In the Pacific, where supply by submarine was possible over great distances, thousands of miles. But generally if the front lines shifted and one side or the other gained complete control resistance was quickly eliminated.
Support of allied forces, primarily repatriation of down fliers and lost troops lasted far longer but even this was limited to areas under relatively light supervision. Penalties for being caught helping an enemy soldier started at being shot but included execution of entire towns. Knowing this most natives practiced a strict hands-off policy.
Spying as resistance was rare and hazardous but was not impossible even within wartime Japan and Germany it lasted throughout the war. But results were inconsistent and people died to get even the smallest bits of information out.
None of those forms of resistance were possible without outside assistance. Even the most rudimentary spying demands that you have someone to give the information to. Most require extensive support efforts, contacts and equipment, to be useful. Almost all of the resistance in European occupied territories was routed through England and had it been captured resistance on the continent would have fallen apart.
To the extent the US could support resistance in England there might have been an organized resistance. But active armed resistance would have been largely out of the question once Churchill's groups had be hunted down. Best estimates say they would have only lasted a few weeks.
That isn't to say they wouldn't have made a difference while they lasted. The Germans were delayed in their attack on Russia by the unexpectedly bloody fight in Greece. Many historians think had the attack started even one week earlier the Russians would have folded before the winter set in.
The hypothetical invasion of England would have delayed German operations for months, making even the limited success they experienced in Russia doubtful, and might have precipitated an early entry of the US into the war. A completely different world.
Previous Topic
Index
