#189406 - 11/29/0904:58 AMGood 4+ minute signal mirror tutorial video on Web
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
Air Force Academy retired survival training director Peter Kummerfeldt lectures/demonstrates signal mirrors for 4:34 of this 5:28 long video clip online:
The video is one of three survival videos included in this article by KXRM FOX 21 of Colorado Springs, one each on: - Fire Building - Shelter - Signaling
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
In the video above, Peter mentions seeing a 2"x3" glass mirror flash at 26 mile range, which I can believe - the 1800's surveyor rule of thumb for a naked eye visible mirror flash was 10 miles per inch of side length for a square mirror, which would be roughly 24 miles for a 2"x3" mirror.
Similar results were reported by the U.S. Navy in 1951 signaling from the ground with a 3"x5" glass mirror in "good visibility" to a plane at 5,000 feet altitude reported ranges of:
45 miles with "the plane between the sun and the mirror" 30 miles with the sun at right angles 21 miles "down sun"
Please note such ranges generally require the air to be quite clear and/or thin - 43 miles is pushing it for a 3"x5" mirror in city atmosphere. I've run tests in more typical "light smog" weather when, despite moving one end to 5,689 ft altitude, and using a 12"x12" mirror, the flash was barely visible with binoculars at 48 mile range, and a 12"x12" glass mirror isn't the most practical piece of survival kit.
In my 43 mile test, both ends were at about 500' elevation, the air was very clear, and the sun to signal line range was 90 degrees. We could see each other's 3"x5" mirror flashes with the naked eye.
Edited by rafowell (11/29/0906:25 AM)
_________________________
A signal mirror should backup a radio distress signal, like a 406 MHz PLB (ACR PLB)(Ocean Signal PLB)
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
A bit about me, since I just joined the forum:
I'm more into mirror signaling than survival per se.
The white spot in my avatar is not the sun (which was off to the right) but rather a view of the "virtual sun" ("fireball" / "bright light spot") created by the retroreflective bead aiming mesh of a glass signal mirror.
The U.S. military switched to retroreflective aimers on their signal mirrors from their (already deployed) system of "rearsight" mirrors after finding that even the primitive first generation of retroreflective aimers was 2.5 times as effective as the rearsight method for the (admittedly difficult) task of signaling from a bobbing liferaft to a moving plane.
These results and this decision was announced in: "Signaling with Mirrors: Reflex-Button Type of Mirror Adopted for Navy Survival", Naval Aviation News, 15 Sept 1944, pp. 32-33, which can be downloaded from the official government site here: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1940s/1944/15sep44.pdf
yelp
Member
Registered: 06/04/08
Posts: 172
Loc: Colorado
Mr. Fowell,
Thank you for the citation and your observations. We need these much more than the typical "+1" comment left on other forums (which I'm guilty of - so shoot me). Also commendable is the lack of emoticons and LOLs...but that's just my opinion.
Really though, you've provided credible data. That's invaluable, especially considering it might involve one's life.
Cheers!
_________________________
(posting this as someone that has unintentionally done a bunch of stupid stuff in the past and will again...)
That is great video you shot. Thanks for it. I am also interested in signaling technology and want to do some tests in the near future. One thing with these tests that concerns me a little bit is how not to attract unwanted attention and start search and rescue operation . I guess one ought not to flash 3x etc.
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
We tested signal mirrors today at 22 mile range, under favorable conditions, using:
(1) 3"x5" glass mirror ( GI issue MIL-M-18371E) (2) 2"x3" plastic mirror ( American Medical Kits "Rescue Flash" model) (3) 2"x3" stainless steel with aiming hole
I recorded each on video and put the first two on YouTube.
The 3"x5" (~15 sq. in) mirror was clearly visible at 22 miles with my naked eye - I called out dozens of flashes.
The 2"x3" (~6 sq. in) plastic mirror I saw about four times in 2 minutes with my naked eye. It wasn't because there weren't many times that many flashes heading my direction - you can see the flashes clearly in the video when I'm saying I can't see it on the sound track. I think it is just that with this smaller, less reflective mirror, only the strongest flashes were visible to me.
The 2"x3" (~6 sq. in) stainless mirror I didn't see at all with my naked eye - presumably because the metal was even less reflective than the plastic. it wasn't because it wasn't flashing in my direction - the flashes are clearly visible in the video when I'm saying I can't see it on the sound track. I also could see them when I used my 7x50 binoculars. I'm sure I'd have seen it easily at, say, ten mile range.
The air was quite clear - I could see mountains 94 miles away. The background was good and dark - you can see that in the video. He also had the advantage to signaling almost directly into the sun. Both ends were at about 1000 ft elevation.
I'd expect a bit more range if we were at higher altitude, or with stronger sun, but on the other hand I'd expect to lose range if we were at an angle to the sun.
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
Originally Posted By: KenK
I REALLY wish you'd have tested a 2"x3" glass signal mirror too.
That would resolve the question of whether the 2"x3" Rescue Flash's performance was a matter of size or material.
Understood. I've shipped my friend a 2"x3" glass mirror (and a 4"x5" stainless steel mirror, as well), and I'm trying to get more volunteers so we can do some side by side simultaneous comparison rather than sequential.
_________________________
A signal mirror should backup a radio distress signal, like a 406 MHz PLB (ACR PLB)(Ocean Signal PLB)
#193214 - 01/11/1004:25 AMMore good signal mirror videos - on YouTube
[Re: rafowell]
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
Originally Posted By: rafowell
Air Force Academy retired survival training director Peter Kummerfeldt lectures/demonstrates signal mirrors for 4:34 of this 5:28 long video clip online:
I've looked through the various survival signal mirror videos on YouTube and put together a "playlist" of those I thought were good, sorted roughly by my ranking.
[ Disclosure: many of these are mine <grin>, though only one of the top seven. ]
#1: Survival Signal Mirror Flashes at 0.7, 11.1, 43 mile range {Mine} #2: Starflash survival signal mirror 2x3" #3: Survival: How to use a Signal Mirror. #4: Ed Viesturs Survival Essentials { Some non-mirror stuff, but demo of Rescue Flash #5: MDB signal Mirror PT1 { Part 1 of a 3-part review of Rescue Flash & 4 others} #6: MDB signal Mirror PT2 #7: MDB signal Mirror PT3 #8: 3"x5" Glass Signal Mirror at 44 miles - digital zoom {mine} #9: 01 { Comparison of 5 signal mirrors - field test } #10: Signal Mirror { comparison: mirror, Altoids tin, aluminum foil} #11: 22 mile flash, 3"x5" glass mirror {mine} #12: 22 mile flash, 2"x3" plastic mirror {Rescue Flash, mine} #13: 3"x5" glass signal mirror at 44 miles - digital zoom {mine} #14: 3"x5" glass signal mirror at 44 miles {mine} #15: Signal Mirror Flashes at 11.1 miles (3"x5" glass mirror) {mine} #16: espejos de señal (signal mirrors) {flashes from multiple sites}
_________________________
A signal mirror should backup a radio distress signal, like a 406 MHz PLB (ACR PLB)(Ocean Signal PLB)
#207777 - 09/11/1007:15 PMNice new signal mirror video, plus 3 old ones.
[Re: rafowell]
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
Here's another signal mirror video that was posted recently. Note that the user tried aiming the mirror with and without the "fireball" aiming aid, and found the aiming aid worked much better for them. Interesting to hear the reactions of folks who hadn't seen a signal mirror in action before.
(The Peter Kummerfeldt video at the start of this thread is offline at the moment, but I contacted the reporter and he says he'll get it back online - I'll post again when that happens.)
While I've posted it elsewhere, here's a WWII training video for mirrors aimed by the "double-sided mirror" method, with general discussion of signal mirror range, etc. (Slow start, but there is narrative and video after a minute or so).
Here again (not new) is my video of a 3"x5" glass mirror at 0.7, 11.1 and 43 miles (the last on a _very_clear day).
This last is the 2"x3" American Medical Kits "Rescue Flash" mirror designed by Doug Ritter, at 22 miles. Note that the telephoto video is more sensitive than the naked eye, but you can here me call out the flashes that were visible to my (middle aged) naked eyes.
_________________________
A signal mirror should backup a radio distress signal, like a 406 MHz PLB (ACR PLB)(Ocean Signal PLB)
#207791 - 09/12/1002:16 AMRe: Nice new signal mirror video, plus 3 old ones.
[Re: sotto]
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
Originally Posted By: sotto
My understanding is that even a board freshly dipped in water will give a strong sun reflection.
If a board is the best you've got, wetting it down is worth a shot (or any flat material). It is likely to have the advantage of a lot of area to make up for the lower reflectance.
I'd make sure it is the best I had, though. Flat window glass is better, and flat sheet metal better yet. There have been several rescues due to reflected light from ration tins.
The wet board suffers from:
[1] lower reflectivity [2] poor flatness [3] the problem of aiming
In detail:
[1] lower reflectivity
You're basically reflecting off the surface of water, which is less reflective than a mirror, though the disadvantage does drop at shallow angles[A]. A good glass mirror has a reflectivity of better than 85% When signaling directly to the sun (e.g., East at dawn) the glass mirror is 40 times more reflective than water, and plain window glass twice as much. When the sun is directly overhead (noon at the equator) and you are signaling to the horizon (90 deg sun-mirror-target), the glass mirror is still 29 times as reflective as the water, and the window glass 1.8 times as much. When the sun-mirror-target angle is 135 degrees, the mirror is still 7 times as reflective as the board.
[2] poor flatness
What makes a good signal mirror surprisingly bright is that the sun beam reflected off a flat surface is very narrow and concentrated - about 0.54 deg in diameter, or the apparent size of Lincoln's head on a penny held at arms length (or a full moon). If non-flatness doubles the width of that cone, the brightness drops 4x (though it is admittedly easier to hit something). That's why, as an improvised mirror, the window glass is far better than the wet board - the flatness is better as well as the reflectivity.
[3] The problem of aiming
What makes a real signal mirror much better than a plain mirror is the aiming aid. As the maker of this week's video learned, it is far easier to hit your target with a retroreflective aiming aid than with the "vee-finger" approach.
My understanding is that even a board freshly dipped in water will give a strong sun reflection.
If a board is the best you've got, wetting it down is worth a shot (or any flat material). It is likely to have the advantage of a lot of area to make up for the lower reflectance.
I'd make sure it is the best I had, though. Flat window glass is better, and flat sheet metal better yet. There have been several rescues due to reflected light from ration tins.
The wet board suffers from:
[1] lower reflectivity [2] poor flatness [3] the problem of aiming
In detail:
[1] lower reflectivity
You're basically reflecting off the surface of water, which is less reflective than a mirror, though the disadvantage does drop at shallow angles[A]. A good glass mirror has a reflectivity of better than 85% When signaling directly to the sun (e.g., East at dawn) the glass mirror is 40 times more reflective than water, and plain window glass twice as much. When the sun is directly overhead (noon at the equator) and you are signaling to the horizon (90 deg sun-mirror-target), the glass mirror is still 29 times as reflective as the water, and the window glass 1.8 times as much. When the sun-mirror-target angle is 135 degrees, the mirror is still 7 times as reflective as the board.
[2] poor flatness
What makes a good signal mirror surprisingly bright is that the sun beam reflected off a flat surface is very narrow and concentrated - about 0.54 deg in diameter, or the apparent size of Lincoln's head on a penny held at arms length (or a full moon). If non-flatness doubles the width of that cone, the brightness drops 4x (though it is admittedly easier to hit something). That's why, as an improvised mirror, the window glass is far better than the wet board - the flatness is better as well as the reflectivity.
[3] The problem of aiming
What makes a real signal mirror much better than a plain mirror is the aiming aid. As the maker of this week's video learned, it is far easier to hit your target with a retroreflective aiming aid than with the "vee-finger" approach.
OK, I looked at those equations, and it looks like the best signaling mirror then would be a flattened stick silvered on one side rather than a small rectangle (i.e. a ruler or yardstick shape) and held vertically and swept slowly back and forth across the target a la the beam from a Rescue Laser Flare. It would be highly reflective and theoretically throw a beam with a larger angle and with a greater chance of sweeping across the target (or horizon) in the case of "wishful" signalling. As I recall, the Fresnel lenses in the old lighthouses were long narrow prisms rather than relatively short rectangles. One could flatten one side of a hiking staff, for example, and mount a plexiglas mirror on it. I'm gonna try that sometime when I get tired of hanging upside down over the Santa Monica freeway for grins. ;-)
Edit: In the course or thinking about this further, I ran across this compact potentially useful solution:
#212751 - 12/09/1006:41 AMV-finger signal mirror tutorial, comparisons
[Re: rafowell]
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
Here's a new signal mirror training video on YouTube, and some comparison of results using various methods of aiming signal mirrors.
The new video teaches the "V-finger" method of aiming signal mirrors, a method taught in USAF survival manuals for aiming improvised signal mirrors.
There's a lot of good stuff in this <4 minute video - I think this video was extremely well done. The author has other survival-themed videos I plan to look at.
- The video illustrates the V-finger method from many points of view:
signaler's point of view
profile view of signaler
side view of signaler
receiver view of signaler
- It also adds
tips on making the flash look artificial and deliberate
safety tips
some physics
mention of signaling with moonlight
notes that many of your flashes will miss using V-finger
While knowing how to use an improvised reflector as a signal mirror is important, I stress that you will put many more flashes on your target if you use a mirror with a retroreflective aiming aid (e.g. the Doug Ritter designed Rescue Flash, the Ultimate Survival StarFlash used by the USAF and USCG, Coghlan's glass "Survival Signal mirror", Coglan's floating "Sight-Grid Signal Mirror" etc.).
Does a good aimer make a big difference?
You bet!
In the video above, the signaler gets about 22 solid flashes/minute using V-finger. In the video below, a newbie gets over 60 flashes/minute with a mesh retroreflective aimer.
In the flashing sequence of the first video (2:40-3:03) I see 8 solid flashes* in 22 seconds (about 22 flashes/minute), at short range, and if I look closely, I see 13 faint flickers as well, so at least 58 flashes/minute are going out, but most are missing, as his voiceover notes.
In contrast, in the video below, my friend's flashes hit me nearly continuously, using a mirror with a mesh retroreflector aimer. This is all the more impressive when you know this is my friend's first session with this mirror (which I loaned him), and I'm seeing these nearly continuous flashes with my naked eye at a range of 22 miles. (My counting in the narration is to try to see how many seconds of essentially continuous illumination he could manage.)
( Full screen version at YouTube ) This is a solid clue that hitting the target using V-finger aiming isn't as easy as you'd like - but why is it hard?
The first video also illustrates some of the problems you face with V-finger aiming.
First, the signal mirror beam is very narrow. At 3:47 into the first video, you can see the mirror spot on the stop sign. See how small that spot is - a fraction of the apparent width of a finger, and an even smaller fraction of the space between the V-finger. At my arm length, the spot is the apparent size of Lincoln's head on a penny, as seen on the right photo at this link.
Since the mirror lights both fingers in the V-finger, the naive may think that any target they see between the V-finger will be hit. As you can see from the spot on the stop sign - not even close.
Your flash will be on target with the V-finger technique if: (a) Your target is exactly (remember Lincoln's head) centered between your V-fingers. (b) Your mirror flash is exactly centered on your V-fingers ( with a small mirror, the V-finger spread is slightly wider than the flash, so you can see the edges of the light rectangle on your fingers and use that to center the mirror flash on your fingers). (c) Your eye is exactly centered on the physical mirror ( I would mark the center of the bottom edge of the mirror, hold the mirror right over my eye, and look under it, right below the center of the mirror.)
Even if you get two of these three exactly right, if the third is wrong by the apparent width of Lincoln's head, then your target won't get the full flash. You've got to get all three right. ( At short range, you get a bit of a break - they may see the (much) fainter diffuse glint that occurs around the main flash.)
Fine, you say, but for those in trouble who don't have a signal mirror on them, what are they to do other than V-finger?
My first suggestion would be - make your own aimer on the spot - if you have a mirror, it isn't hard to make an aimer that will really give you a step up.
=== Field-expedient signal mirror aimer - aiming hole ===
The first "step up" in mirror aimers is to put a ~ 1/8" sighting hole in the reflector - you can scrape off the silvering on the back of a glass mirror to make a sighting hole, drill a hole in a metal/plastic mirror, or, if you've procrastinated until you are in trouble, auger a hole in a CD/DVD with your knife point.
Now, you can look through that hole at the target, line up your finger tip with the target, catch the "shadow spot" cast by the hole on your finger, and carefully transfer the shadow spot back and forth from the fingertip to the target.
In the next video, my friend is using this method for the first time, at 22 mile range, using the "Silent Universal Signals Mirror" a thin lightweight 2"x3" stainless steel
This segment is twice as long as the 22 second flashing segment in the first video, and you can hear me counting out 22 hits - about 11 hits for every 8 with V-finger. However, that's at 22 mile range (though with 8x binoculars). Looking carefully at the video (full screen, HD), even at 22 miles I see more than 20 flashes in each of the first and second segment, so at a more realistic range of 5 miles or so (where the flashes will be over 19 times brighter) the receiver will be seeing many more flashes than I did here.
rafowell ... thanks for posting some very interesting data on the visibility of mirror flashes. My takeaway is that I can count on about 20-25 miles for a mirror flash, but i might get lucky with much greater distances if the observer is in the same direction as the sun.
Incidentally, I have some independent confirmation from the Coast Guard. I asked one of their helo pilots what type of rescue signal they recommend. He told me that mirror flashes were by far the most effective signal on sunny days, and could be seen over 20 miles.
Your data have persuaded me that there is some value in having a larger mirror, such as a 3 inch x 5 inch device.
#240228 - 01/29/1209:27 AMSignal Mirror Tests at 22 mile range
[Re: rafowell]
rafowell
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/29/09
Posts: 261
Loc: Southern California
We tested a dozen signal mirrors over a 22-mile range today.
We'd used this range before, but not tested a 2"x3" glass mirror, so we made sure to test one this time.
My tester found the Coghlan's 2"x3" glass mirror and the Rescue Flash easiest to use.
To get a feel for the number of flashes, I recommend these be played back in full screen (use the icon at the bottom right of the frame at YouTube) and 720HD quality (use the "gear" icon at the bottom of the frame).
Note that the camera sees many more flashes than I call out with my naked eye (it is an 18x telephoto - comparable sensitivity to my eye with 7x50 binoculars).
Arranged in descending brightness (not all mirrors posted to YouTube)
One geeky technical note - to provide a target visible at 22 miles to sight to, I used a British World War II heliograph with 5" diameter mirror: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paEyVKJNIYs
_________________________
A signal mirror should backup a radio distress signal, like a 406 MHz PLB (ACR PLB)(Ocean Signal PLB)
#240370 - 02/01/1204:26 AMRe: Signal Mirror Tests at 22 mile range
[Re: rafowell]
Aussie
Enthusiast
Registered: 11/12/10
Posts: 205
Loc: Australia
Rafowell, those are some awesome tests. They are very informative.
I must admit I was not expecting much flash from 22mi, but as you say, the camera captures more that you can “see”. It does seem that a SAR would have to be paying attention to spot that flash
WARNING & DISCLAIMER:
SELECT AND USE OUTDOORS AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES AND TECHNIQUES AT YOUR OWN RISK. Information posted
on this forum is not reviewed for accuracy and may not be reliable, use at your own risk. Please
review the full WARNING & DISCLAIMER about information on this
site.
. I guess one ought not to flash 3x etc.
Previous Topic
Index
