#187306 - 11/03/0904:26 PMRe: Dogs: the proper response?
[Re: Compugeek]
Paul810
Veteran
Registered: 03/02/03
Posts: 1428
Loc: NJ, USA
The police "Use of Force Continuum" is pretty much what I think of when it comes to how I should handle a dangerous person or animal. It goes something like this:
1. Physical/Verbal Presence (look and sound tough) 2. Light hand-to-hand techniques (blocking, arm locks, pushing ect) 3. Mace/Pepper Spray/other Less than Lethal 4. Heavy hand-to-hand (punches/kicks) 5. Baton 6. Threat of deadly force 7. Deadly force
It's not perfectly adapted; for example, as a citizen I avoid the hand-to-hand stuff whenever possible, instead preferring the methods that allow me to keep my distance and escape. But, the basic idea is there. If it came to aggressive dogs I would do the following:
1. Aggressive stance and yelling -if that doesn't work- 2. Pepper Spray them and try to get away -if that doesn't work- 3. Hit them hard with stick/baton/whatever -if that doesn't work- 4. Shoot if armed and I feel it's necessary to keep them from attacking
With that said, if I see an aggressive dog latched on to a child's arm or something it's getting a kick to the head and a couple rounds of hot lead. There's no reason to waste time at that point.
WARNING & DISCLAIMER:
SELECT AND USE OUTDOORS AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES AND TECHNIQUES AT YOUR OWN RISK. Information posted
on this forum is not reviewed for accuracy and may not be reliable, use at your own risk. Please
review the full WARNING & DISCLAIMER about information on this
site.