I guess as wrong as it seems to be, in this context it makes sense. I googled Good Samaritan Laws and found this on Wikipedeia.

"Good Samaritan provisions are not universal in application. The legal principle of imminent peril may also apply.[8] In the absence of imminent peril, the actions of a rescuer may be perceived by the courts to be reckless and not worthy of protection. To illustrate, a motor vehicle collision occurs, but there is no fire, no immediate life threat from injuries and no danger of a second collision. If a 'good Samaritan' elects to 'rescue' the victim from the wreckage, causing paralysis or some other injury, a court may rule that good Samaritan laws do not apply because the victim was not in imminent peril and hold the actions of the rescuer as 'reckless' and unnecessary"

It makes it difficult to decide what to do. I dunno .... However, I have strayed from the original question about first aid kits. Perhaps this is a topic for further discussion in a different post. Apologies to the original poster for the thread hijack.

LW