#174917 - 06/16/09 07:34 PM
Re: DTV Update: Worse than I expected
[Re: MartinFocazio]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: 09/09/06
Posts: 323
Loc: Iowa
|
Martin,
I feel your pain but the "bad engineering" was probably mostly due to the bad politics. Engineers don't always (or even regularly) pick the top level requirements. Someone in the big corner office said - make it do thus and such and the engineers probably whined and complained the whole time they tried to do a good job with that horrible requirement set pushed on them. If the corner office wants something stupid the engineers are usually stuck with it no matter how they explain/simplify the basics to someone who doesn't have an understanding of the technical impacts, just the business ones.
Hmmm - I think the above may be a bit slanted but what the heck.
- Eric
_________________________
You are never beaten until you admit it. - - General George S. Patton
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#174922 - 06/16/09 08:17 PM
Re: DTV Update: Worse than I expected
[Re: JohnE]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: 12/16/06
Posts: 203
Loc: somewhere out there...
|
It sure sounds like a lot of people aren't scanning for the digital channels to me.
The new tv's need to have the digital channels entered into them to work properly, you may have to scan for existing channels several times in order to get them to work.
All of the descriptions I'm reading here are very reminiscent of what my new HD digital tv was doing before I scanned for the channels. After reading the manual and actually doing the scan, like magic I now get more channels than I even want. It sure sounds like people jump to conclusions. <grin> Seriously, we all know there are folks who think the CD tray is a drink holder. However, this isn't a localized problem. It is a widespread problem and has been for some time. The govts own hacks have admitted they had poor study, poor implimentation, and that many people will no longer even get what they had. It's been an issue for long before the equipment was widely available. It's been on local and national news, radio, and the web. Surely one or two of them attemped to autoselect channels on their DTVs???
_________________________
...got YAK???
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#174999 - 06/18/09 01:34 AM
Re: DTV Update: Worse than I expected
[Re: yeti]
|
Member
Registered: 06/29/06
Posts: 127
Loc: Ca, usa
|
I sooo am not happy with this "digital" conversion. before the conversion i could get about 19 channels on a good day.. now any that come in come in intermitinly. I keep rescanning and that doesn't even help.. and i keep moving the darned anttena.. Cable tv soo isn't in my budget. Ya I thought it was kinda of wierd that the Home shopping network didn't go digital.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#175007 - 06/18/09 04:14 AM
Re: DTV Update: Worse than I expected
[Re: Eric]
|
Addict
Registered: 06/10/08
Posts: 601
Loc: Southern Cal
|
All I'm saying Marty is that everything you've described so far matches exactly what happened to me until I repeatedly re-scanned the new television. It was worse when I originally failed to scan it properly and it was bad until I rescanned it twice now since the official changeover.
I'm not defending poor engineering or antenna designs nor am I maligning your own abilities to fix the problem. Simply relaying a different experience than you're having.
_________________________
JohnE
"and all the lousy little poets comin round tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson"
The Future/Leonard Cohen
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#175009 - 06/18/09 12:05 PM
Re: DTV Update: Worse than I expected
[Re: JohnE]
|
Journeyman
Registered: 06/22/05
Posts: 87
Loc: W. PA
|
It's the nature of digital systems that you either get a perfect picture or you get nothing. Gone are the days of just a watchable signal. It's all or nothing now.
_________________________
Ward
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#175036 - 06/18/09 11:24 PM
Re: DTV Update: Worse than I expected
[Re: Rodion]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/01/07
Posts: 2432
|
Does the antenna have a rotator?
I have one and there are three different azimuths I use most often and it took me a considerable amount of experimentation to discover the best antenna facings.
In perfect conditions I can get all the channels pretty reliably pointing directly at the weakest station and letting the stronger stations use the weaker receiving lobes. But as soon as clouds and storm show up I start to have to point directly at the sending antenna to receive channels. Sometimes it takes a bit of tweaking to make a channel come in.
Rarely, mostly when there is a storm between my antenna and the transmitter, I can't get a channel.
So far the digital change has been fairly worthwhile. Reception is all or nothing but, so far, for the most part, I get all the channels, several more than I used to, all the time.
It wasn't free. I had to get a digital converter. Had I not already had them I would have had to have bought antenna, pole, and rotator. Roughly $250. On the other hand the same money only buys you about four months of cable so I'm ahead of the game.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
1 registered (Michael2),
893
Guests and
36
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|