This is failure of the parent, not the system. If your child is online for 12 hours, he/she CLEARLY needs something else to do.
I know that this was tongue in cheek, but it kind of illustrates a major issue in America;its always someone else's fault, or issue. NEVER our own. Responsiblity starts at home people!!!
If Skynet takes over my neenernetz, I am out!

Ah...the perennial "shut down the internet" meme.

Comes around, like a case of Herpes, when you least expect it. I'd expect the "email postage" meme to come along soon.

So, how do you shut down the Internet, exactly? Do you go to a building on "i" street and Washington DC and throw a switch? Nope.

Do you cut a cable that connect the USA to the rest of the world? Nope.

Do you force every mobile phone system to shut off 3G and Edge data services? Nope.

This is the kind of a bill that comes from technologically illiterate thinking by old farts like Ted "Series of Tubes" Stevens and his aged ilk. They think the internet is a mainframe somewhere. It's not, it never was, it can't be that, it does not work that way..

They simple can't conceptualize what a decentralized, open system is like - and how with a laptop and a wifi base stations and a few cables and gizmos, I could re-enable limited internet within an urban area in a matter of minutes. Let's not even go into how mesh networks & P2P simply bypass ALL central systems (look at the One Laptop Per Child program for more on Meshed systems).

There's much bigger things to fear than some dumb-butt bill that is as rational as a bill outlawing hamburgers.

At the moment, I think we might have some folks in Iraq who get no attention from our media, right now we have people hungry and homeless in America, right now we have millions unemployed, right now we have a barely functional national rail system, right now we have a nation that is about to lose one, and possibly two of the big car makers. All of these are real issues, and this bs about "shutting down the internet" is nonsensical.

That said, if I have a particular data center that's a problem or a particular fiber optic cable that's a problem, of course I want that offline.

Actually, if you think about it, the "Internet" can be shut down, at least within a region.

How does this miracle of information get into your house? Either over phone lines, through a satellite or through a cable modem. And someone must own the lines/cables/satellites or else I wouldn't have to pay for it every month.

So yes, while it may be "difficult" to shut down the internet, it's probably not impossible. All Uncle has to do is force the ISPs to cease supplying service. And yes, this may be as simple as throwing a switch or a breaker. Once the servers are down, no connection, no internet. Sure, it's still out there, but you can't get there from here.

Can "they" do it, dunno. Could it be done - sure. Could it be enforced - possibly, but what a nightmare. It could entail stationing guards at every server farm of every internet provider in the US, and some in Canada and Mexico I would imagine.

Just another reason to love your government. They think things through so well before implementing them.

Just pull the power cables and disable the UPSs from a couple of hundred RAS's and Gateway Servers throughout the USA (even easier with Super User access to the ISPs RAS and Gateway Server databases) and pull the fibre router cards that service the submarine cables in and out of the US. No Internet services for the subscription clients for internet service providers whether this is 3G, Edge, DSL, Fibre etc and no fat pipes into and out of the USA. You might be able to get a dial up connection to an ISP in Canada or Mexico, but most likely in this scenario ordinary telecoms would be blacked out as well. A well planned exercise in shutting down the appropriate fat pipe fibre nodes, rerouting government and military TCP/IP traffic on a shadow network and terminated all the ISPs customers PPP sessions and not allowing them back on to the ISPs networks (lack of PPP authentication access) could probably be achieved within 24hrs

What is even more amazing is this;

So if the idea of shutting down the interenet is a farce, I assume this must be the primary goal. Seems a bit redundant though. I though they already had unrestricted access due to the total compliance of the ISP's.

The Internet, not just the World Wide Web, was designed by DARPA to survive a nuclear strike. That's why it is so redundant with regards to paths. The govt certainly could shut down some ISP's, I would be willing to bet that a black market would pop up pretty quick. Even if you had to dial in to a server in Switzerland.

I'm afraid that it is not so simple to circumvent a purposeful shutdown. Consider a government mandated plug-pull would be essentially a multi-faceted attack, consisting of both hardware and software. You might have a chance at keeping a few independent local nodes up, but the majority of the system would be hacked down via software or the hardline backbone would just be turned off or the rf spectrum would saturate. I really don't want to sound like a conspiracy nut, but I have put my hands in the government network once already, and from my experience, if they really want to pull the plug, I have no doubt they can pull it off.

It might not really be skynet, but NSA ain't too far off the mark.

To take out a majority of the internet along the east coast, my understanding is you just have to take out MAE-EAST in Resont, VA. It's been a number of years, but when I was doing network stuff, I remember doing traceroutes and nearly every one of them went through MAE-EAST.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAE-East

well, in that vein, the focus of Why We're Pissed just shifts from losing access to netflix to the fact that they're wasting time and money on such absurd legislation when there are so many better things to deal with.

irrationality is the mother of tyranny, and the fact that "shutting down the internet" would supposedly be impractical or even impossible doesn't mean irrational people wont try.