Since nobody has asked so far, why not get the Ritter fixed blade? The dimensions are about the same.
Which one is better and why?
For some the show-stopper is the cost of the Ritter Mk3. In my view it is actually a great price considering its a semi-custom with high-end steel and handle material. My advice would be to skip the lower-cost blades, save your pennies, and go with the Mk3.
Better blade shape - in my opinion - I like the fixed Rittergrip's wider (deeper?) blade shape better ... ever since I got my first Mk1 many years ago.
Better blade finish - the stonewashed finish looks real nice - kind of 3D-ish. Doug says it adds corrosion resistance too. Sweet!
Better blade steel - will stay sharp much longer - some say the S30V is hard to sharpen, but that has not been my experience, at least not with my Spyderco Sharpmaker.
Better handle material - G10 is abut the toughest handle available - the machined surface provides excellent grip without being rough on hands.
I like the sheath better, but others might not agree.
PLUS, part of the cost goes to support the ETS Foundation.