#164970 - 01/25/09 06:37 PM
Re: job interviewer play psychological game with ppl
[Re: picard120]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 08/03/07
Posts: 3078
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#164973 - 01/25/09 06:57 PM
Re: job interviewers play psychological games
[Re: Stretch]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5357
Loc: SOCAL
|
Another thought is that while Picard may have thought he was interviewing for a specific job, the interviewer may have had other jobs in mind knowing that Picard's job was already filled, much like in the Monty Python vid. or Maybe he was brushing up on his interrogation techniques as practice for upcoming openings at the CIA. . .
_________________________
Better is the Enemy of Good Enough. Okay, what’s your point??
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#164974 - 01/25/09 07:08 PM
Re: job interviewers play psychological games
[Re: Russ]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 11/27/06
Posts: 707
Loc: Alamogordo, NM
|
Anything's possible.....I suppose.
_________________________
DON'T BE SCARED -Stretch
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#164987 - 01/25/09 10:26 PM
Re: job interviewers play psychological games
[Re: Stretch]
|
Member
Registered: 10/08/05
Posts: 108
|
Another thing to remember, many of the best interview courses teach a simple concept...
"Hire for attitude, train for skills"
Contrary to what many people believe, for many companies attitude, leadership qualities, "gravitas", cultural fit, etc tend to trump skills and prior experience. This is especially true in certain roles and/or in progressive companies.
The rationale here being that knowledge and skills can be taught or bought. But attitude and other intangibles cannot ever.
Please trust me when I tell you that this mindset is prevalent among many of the best companies.
Hope this helps,
_________________________
MedB
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#164989 - 01/25/09 10:42 PM
Re: job interviewers play psychological games
[Re: MedB]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 12/18/08
Posts: 1534
Loc: Muskoka
|
So Picard, did you get the job or not?
_________________________
May set off to explore without any sense of direction or how to return.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#165007 - 01/26/09 01:14 AM
Re: job interviewer play psychological game with ppl
[Re: picard120]
|
Addict
Registered: 12/07/04
Posts: 530
Loc: Massachusetts
|
Why do job interviewer play psychological games on job applicants?
I went to job interviewer but the they didn't ask me about behavior questions or technical questions.
I feel like job interview is equivalent to UN negotiation at Gaza strip. It made me angry. I want to strangle the interviewer.
how do you respond to these stupid psychological games? I feel like I am in CIA interrogation session. Sounds like you had a rough session. I have taken a couple "train the interviewer" type courses in a couple roles I had in a past life. I remember that for some jobs, the interviewer was being trained to put the person being interviewed in an uncomfortable mindset, to see how they handle stress, and responding under pressure. It's not "nice", but, sometimes it's by design. Of course, other times, it's just a nasty person doing the interview...
_________________________
- Ron
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#165090 - 01/26/09 05:45 PM
Re: job interviewers play psychological games
[Re: airballrad]
|
Rapscallion
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 02/06/04
Posts: 4020
Loc: Anchorage AK
|
I would not be where I am today in my career were it not for the interview. You can only put so much on paper, and no dialogue. After doing commission retail sales for a living long ago, I learned how to tell people just what they want to hear, and then shut my mouth and let them say the next thing. Selling yourself is no different than selling a 75 Maverick. You have to be able to read your customer, build an instant rapport with them, and confidently convince them you have what they want and are the only person they can get it from. Beyond any other job skill I have, that gets me the job when I have absolutely no credentials on paper to have the job. The way it usually goes is I start at or near the bottom of the list at the start of my interview. It's because on paper I don't have this huge stack of diplomas and formal training and certifications. But as we progress through the interview, I know just enough of the technical aspects of this work and how this industry functions on a general level that I can "sell the package" as being just what they are looking for, with the right experience, the right knowledge, and most importantly, the right level of confidence.
The technical skills are what allow you to keep the job, and I figured out a long time ago that I can learn what I need to do my job once I get there pretty much, but what gets me in the door has very little to do with actual technical skills, and everything to do with being able to read the interviewer(s) whether in person or over the phone, and being able to tell them what they want to hear, with confidence. Heck, most of the time they practically give me the answers anyways. By the time I get out of the interview, I have become one of the top two candidates for the job, and all that's left then is a quick follow up and negotiation and I am in, if I want it. And the beauty is anyone can do this, all they have to do is practice, just like I did selling waterbeds and used cars for a living a long time ago.
If there's one piece of advice I offer to anyone in any interview about what to say about themselves, it is this. If you can convince the interviewer that you are an expert problem solver, you are most likely going to get the job. Go through your life history, especially your work history, but if that is lean use whatever life experience you can to demonstrate that you can solve whatever problem you are faced with. That one aspect of yourself will pretty much make or break the deal, all other aspects being more or less relative amongst the candidates. You may not have the best set of technical skills, but you will have the advantage over the rest of the applicants if you can make the boss believe you are can rise to the occasion.
_________________________
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools. -- Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#165140 - 01/26/09 11:01 PM
Re: job interviewer play psychological game with ppl
[Re: Stretch]
|
HTMLSpinnr
Unregistered
|
HTMLSpinnr: Why can;t the "reply box" just be a general reply? Why does it have to NAME the person it replies to? I mean, by the time you read through all the posts in a thread, you're ready to reply, NOT scroll back up, click "reply" on a certain poster (usually the OP), and then reply. It truly is a pain....
That's a fantastic question that should be directed to the author of UBBThreads ;-) I personally use Quick Reply w/ little regard to who I'm replying to UNLESS I need to quote someone. No need to overcomplicated, though I suppose for those who view threaded (ick) vs. flat (yay) it could become a bit confusing. These are personal opinions of course ;-)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
0 registered (),
462
Guests and
83
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|