#157852 - 12/10/08 08:16 AM
Wound Packing?
|
Troglodyte007
Unregistered
|
Can anyone with professional experience tell me what the best emergency wound packing material is? I am thinking in terms of a material that won't leave any fibers behind when removed. There must be a best practice type of gauze or something that can be used to that effect. I saw some wound packing gauze that comes in small plastic bottles, but I don't think that is for bloodstopping on larger deeper wounds, but I could be wrong. I know about QC Combat Gauze but I am trying to find something that has no expiration date.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157853 - 12/10/08 12:00 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: ]
|
Veteran
Registered: 11/01/08
Posts: 1530
Loc: DFW, Texas
|
Try this old thread. This one also may help, pardon my initial rant here. Then there is this. Good luck. PS. When all else fails, feminine hygiene pads work really well also. I have seen more than one soldier injured (not wounded) that had an issue kotex pad wrapped to a major laceration.
Edited by Desperado (12/10/08 12:26 PM)
_________________________
I do the things that I must, and really regret, are unfortunately necessary.
RIP OBG
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157864 - 12/10/08 02:30 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: NightHiker]
|
Jakam
Unregistered
|
I'm thinking that almost anything "invasive" will have an expiration date for the purpose of sterile packaging integrity?
Those Israeli bandagaes are on the marketplace forum on sale, if I read correctly.
Lots of talk about quick clot , just a reminder that the granular version is exo-thermic (creates heat when in contact with water, lots of heat) and they require special removal, keep the packaging with the victim for post trauma responders so they know what it is.
But they have really improved their dressings to not only lessen the heat factor but to make removal easier. I think the zeolite versions are a very interesting alternative, and they offer a good variety, even a pet specific dressing.
Has anyone had success with quik clot?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157871 - 12/10/08 03:21 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: ]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 11/09/06
Posts: 870
Loc: wellington, fl
|
I'm thinking that almost anything "invasive" will have an expiration date for the purpose of sterile packaging integrity?
This is one of the great medical myths. I blame my profession for it, along with the marketing departments of the vendors. Rant follows: Sterile is sterile. Loss of sterility is event related, not time related. To render a sterile product non-sterile, you gotta penetrate the packaging and put some microorganisms on it. Sterile items remain sterile as long as the packaging is intact. Intact means not perforated and dry. During WWII, the OR at columbia-presbyterian hospital was short of cotton sterile wraps, so the wrapped some of their sets in newspaper and autoclaved them. These sets found their way to the back of the closet, and were rediscovered in the '60's. Opened and tested, the sets were proven to still be sterile, Presumably because the wrappers were intact, not because the microbes died of old age. Sterile products become unsterile before the expiration date if contaminated by breach of packaging, and stay sterile long after expiration if the package is intact. Expiration dates are applied to such by folks who don't look at the science. "Wound packing" is an interesting term. IME, it is applied to treatment of a draining wound to maintain an opening to permit drainage to continue. If a boil/abscess is lanced, the wound will be packed with iodoform or plain gauze ribbon(or a latex drain), so that the wound does not close and trap infected material or blood inside, causing another abscess or hematoma. Stopping the bleeding, or hemostatsis, involves bulky dressings and pressure-Kerlix sponges, abdominal pads, tampons (generic term for big rolls of gauze), surgical sponges, wrapped up in ace bandages, or with manual pressure. There is another approach to hemostatsis. Many of us carry locking forceps as a matter of course.One of the original purposes of this device was hemostasis-some folks call them hemostats. The procedure is, you look in the wound, identify a big artery or vein, and then clamp it off. Easier if you are a surgeon, and have just cut the vessel, and are working in an OR with bright lights, sterile surroundings, and OR staff to hand you the clamp. Harder if you are upside down in a ditch, in the dark, in the snow, all by yourself. Which is why paramedics are paid better than surgeons...you say they're not paid better than surgeons?...something is terribly wrong...
_________________________
Dance like you have never been hurt, work like no one is watching,love like you don't need the money.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157877 - 12/10/08 03:54 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: nursemike]
|
Icon of Sin
Addict
Registered: 12/31/07
Posts: 512
Loc: Nebraska
|
Expiration dates are applied to such by folks who don't look at the science. Lawyers or beancounters...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157887 - 12/10/08 04:49 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: ]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 04/16/03
Posts: 1076
|
I am thinking in terms of a material that won't leave any fibers behind when removed. If a wound is so severe that it genuinely needs packing, fuzz from the packing is the least of your concerns in terms of debris. Such a wound will require full surgical debridement anyway. American SOF medics have used Kerlix for decades to pack wounds. Click here for a video showing how, as taught by a former SF 18-Delta.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157891 - 12/10/08 05:13 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: nursemike]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 03/08/07
Posts: 2208
Loc: Beer&Cheese country
|
[quote=Jakam]
"Wound packing" is an interesting term. IME, it is applied to treatment of a draining wound to maintain an opening to permit drainage to continue. If a boil/abscess is lanced, the wound will be packed with iodoform or plain gauze ribbon(or a latex drain), so that the wound does not close and trap infected material or blood inside, causing another abscess or hematoma. Stopping the bleeding, or hemostatsis, involves bulky dressings and pressure-Kerlix sponges, abdominal pads, tampons (generic term for big rolls of gauze), surgical sponges, wrapped up in ace bandages, or with manual pressure. This pretty much hits it on the head as far as I've seen. However, Kerlix or 4x4s I've heard work well. But, technically, pressure is the approved blood-stopping procedure. The problem with packing is that, while it may work, at some point you have to remove it... along with the clot... and you're back to square one. As for expiration dates, I kind of feel the same way - useless. I bet it's an FDA thing more than a sterility thing. I've personally used an IV that was 2 years past prime, and nothing bad happened. Well, besides the hangover, but that was the reason I had it in the first place.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157902 - 12/10/08 07:12 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: MDinana]
|
Addict
Registered: 06/29/05
Posts: 648
Loc: Arizona
|
Like the others have said, kerlex is the way to go. I personally like the Z-PAK Dressing which is basically a kerlex roll vacuum packed down into a smaller package that is no bigger then a stack of 20 4"x4" gauze pads. I can fit 4-6 of these in the same space as one 4" Kerlex roll. Wound packing in the field for emergency care isn't the same as wound packing for long-term care/treatment. The goal is simply to stop bleeding, and some wounds are too big for bleeding to be controlled with other means. A patient requiring this, as others have stated, are usually in a bad way and need a surgeon and removal of the dressing and cleaning of the wound would more then likely be low in the priority list for this patient. To paraphrase one of the medics who was in Solmolia for the Battle of the Black Sea; "You can never have enough Kerlex".
Edited by Alan_Romania (12/10/08 07:17 PM)
_________________________
"Trust in God --and press-check. You cannot ignore danger and call it faith." -Duke
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157921 - 12/10/08 09:22 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: Alan_Romania]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 04/16/03
Posts: 1076
|
Good points, Alan. N.A. Rescue markets a similar product they call S-rolled gauze that I've trained with. H&H's Pri-Med gauze is even more compact but it is still rolled, not stacked.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#157927 - 12/10/08 11:59 PM
Re: Wound Packing?
[Re: Glock-A-Roo]
|
Veteran
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1371
Loc: Queens, New York City
|
I've been to two severe wound situations as a civilian - once when I was like 13, the other a few years later
Great video, but as I said in my comment, it's way too clean, and it's NOT attached to a screaming body, that won't hold still. That makes it a tad harder to do in real life - getting 1-2 other people to help hold the person being treated still sure helps
I hope someday to take my EMT classes, but with my health, I doubt it - I will encourage both my kids to at least take advanced first air/wilderness first aid, if not EMT, even if they don't intend to become one
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (rabbitroger),
872
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|