Originally Posted By: Alex
I hate shameless propaganda there. Check Reuters about that:
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSLB9471020080811

The opposite side coverage could be found here:
http://en.rian.ru/onlinenews/

But for the serious unbiased scientific view of the events on the subject I'd watch for this article live development:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_South_Ossetia_(2008)


That's funny. The majority (like 99%) of Drudge's items are simply links to existing stories. That's shameless propaganda?
He's basically an RSS feed that selects what he thinks is pertinent. The irony with what you said is that Drudge is the homepage link for many left-leaning journalists so they can keep up with what is going on!

Ironic that you would link a story from Reuters accusing Drudge of propaganda. Reuters has been caught doing REAL propaganda before. "Reuters admits doctoring photos...." www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3286966,00.html

Wikipedia is scientific, and unbiased? Bwahahahahah!


Edited by red (08/24/08 11:00 PM)
Edit Reason: Wikipedia comment
_________________________
When the SHTF, no one comes out of it smelling pretty.