#132824 - 05/14/08 02:59 AM
Earthquake in China Thread
|
Newbie
Registered: 02/25/07
Posts: 45
|
I'm surprised this forum isn't on fire with talk about the quake. I'm devouring the news, photos and videos on the net. There's a lot to be learned here. There are photos showing how people are improvising and adapting. I'm also looking to see how people react to this event. What's working and whats not. I guess I envision a thread to distill the facts as the apply to the scope of this forum. Forget the politics, building codes, and lack of preparation. Lets observe and see if the preparations we endlessly talk about would work there. Lets talk about what these people are doing to survive.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132833 - 05/14/08 04:14 AM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: CDVXF7]
|
Journeyman
Registered: 07/12/05
Posts: 84
|
I live in los angeles and this is a concern for me, earthquakes strikes without warning and the only thing that make me live long enough to use my preparation is pure luck of not buried in the initial tremor.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132846 - 05/14/08 11:14 AM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: CDVXF7]
|
Cranky Geek
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 4642
Loc: Vermont
|
Just another in a long string of bad luck in east Asia. I will say that the PRC appears to have thier ducks in a row, and they aren't hiding it which I applaud them for.
_________________________
-IronRaven
When a man dare not speak without malice for fear of giving insult, that is when truth starts to die. Truth is the truest freedom.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132849 - 05/14/08 12:20 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: horizonseeker]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5359
Loc: SOCAL
|
7.9 is just a number and doesn't mean much until you put it in perspective. The Recent earthquakes map for CA & NV doesn't go to 8 and the biggest we've had lately is a 4.3 off the coast. I suspect that if a 7.9 hit SOCAL that website would go offline -- 7.9 is fraking huge. The death toll in China is going to be high ( but won't approach the death toll in Myanmar from that Cyclone they should have seen coming) and a kit isn't much use if you die in the initial moments. Afterward, if you can find your kit, it's time to start working, no time for bugging out.
_________________________
Better is the Enemy of Good Enough. Okay, what’s your point??
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132863 - 05/14/08 02:39 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: CDVXF7]
|
INTERCEPTOR
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 07/15/02
Posts: 3760
Loc: TX
|
Having an intimate connection with that area, all I've been able to do is weep. I know what is in store for those people, I know what is in store for the children, especially the newly orphaned. Y'all have no idea of the hell that they are in for. Latest news is the earthquake cracked a bunch of dams. If they collapse then things will get worse by several orders of magnitude. For those who wish to help, I can vouch for Half the Sky organization. They are devoted to helping Chinses orphans. With all the money going towards relief efforts these little ones are going to get screwed (more). Sidenote: don't get me started on the Burma typhoon. -Blast
Edited by Blast (05/14/08 02:42 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132864 - 05/14/08 02:40 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: CDVXF7]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/15/05
Posts: 2485
Loc: California
|
A new wrinkle is all the damaged dams in the region. The authorities reported almost 400, mostly small, dams have been damaged. Obviously, flooding downstream is the immediate danger, but then you also face loss of the reservoirs which may supply drinking water to more distant communities. Plus, some may have hydroelectric plants which would presumably be damaged, too, if a dam breaks.
Shifting focus here--I don't know how seismically active the area around the collosal Three Gorges Dam is, but if that puppy ever broke due to a massive quake (and 7.9 really is massive), that would be catastrophic.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132910 - 05/14/08 07:25 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: Russ]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 03/08/07
Posts: 2208
Loc: Beer&Cheese country
|
7.9 is just a number and doesn't mean much until you put it in perspective. The Recent earthquakes map for CA & NV doesn't go to 8 and the biggest we've had lately is a 4.3 off the coast. I suspect that if a 7.9 hit SOCAL that website would go offline -- 7.9 is fraking huge. The death toll in China is going to be high ( but won't approach the death toll in Myanmar from that Cyclone they should have seen coming) and a kit isn't much use if you die in the initial moments. Afterward, if you can find your kit, it's time to start working, no time for bugging out. You're right about SoCal not being hit quite that hard. However, the Landers quake and the one up in The Valley were both in the low 7's, right? 7.3 and 7.1 I believe. For the most part, the area weathered them well. Obviously a 7.9 is quite a bit larger, but I'm hoping that when/if that size hits, my family and the entire region will fare quite a bit better. I doubt they have the building codes in China that we do! Anyway, given the recent turmoil in Asia, I'm glad I'm not living there...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132917 - 05/14/08 09:04 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: CDVXF7]
|
Veteran
Registered: 09/01/05
Posts: 1474
|
Truly sad. Especially for those affected by the "one child" policy. From what I understand, many buildings were not built to specs which led to swift, massive collapse.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132919 - 05/14/08 09:21 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: LED]
|
Stranger
Registered: 03/05/08
Posts: 21
|
in places where earthquakes are a threat, what are the odds a reinforced "bomb shelter" type structure would help? even in the basement for instance, a steel cage type room that could withstand the weight of a crumbled house? with all the usual provisioning of course, this could serve as a good holding area until help arrived. is there even a chance of making it into the cage successfully?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132920 - 05/14/08 09:43 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: steelie]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/15/05
Posts: 2485
Loc: California
|
is there even a chance of making it into the cage successfully? If the building is going to fail, no one is going to have time to get from whatever floor they're on down to the basement. And even if they had the time to get that close to the shelter, I'd rather just make a left turn and head out the front door into the street instead of facing the risk of being entombed. A basement shelter sounds good on paper, but in the real world, no one really can or would want to use it, particularly in places like China, Iran, Turkey or those kinds of seismically active countries that won't have robust emergency services to dig you out afterwards. Actually, since many of the newer collapsed buildings fail because corrupt and greedy builders weren't constructing the buildings to the normal building codes in the first place, I wouldn't count on them constructing the "bomb shelters" any more robustly.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132923 - 05/14/08 10:26 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: MDinana]
|
Cranky Geek
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 4642
Loc: Vermont
|
The trouble is that the Richter scale is based on orders of magnitude. An 8 isn't 1/7th more powerful than a 7, or even twice, but TEN TIMES more powerful. A 7.9 is 9 times stronger than a 7.0. Humans don't generally think that way, we don't have an instinctive frame of reference.
_________________________
-IronRaven
When a man dare not speak without malice for fear of giving insult, that is when truth starts to die. Truth is the truest freedom.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132930 - 05/15/08 12:41 AM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: ironraven]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 11/26/06
Posts: 724
Loc: Sterling, Virginia, United Sta...
|
An 8 isn't 1/7th more powerful than a 7, or even twice, but TEN TIMES more powerful. A 7.9 is 9 times stronger than a 7.0. Close, but not quite perfect. You are correct that a magnitude 8.0 earthquake is ten times more powerful than a magnitude 7.0. However, a magnitude 7.9 earthquake is (approximately) 7.94 times more powerful than a magnitude 7.0, not 9 times more powerful. To convert a (logarithmic) Richter magnitude number to a (dimensionless) linear scale for comparative purposes, use the formula: 10^Mag So: 10^7.9 ÷ 10^7.0 = 7.94 Or (for the less mathematically challenged): 10^(7.9 - 7.0) = 7.94 P.S.: You can do similar comparisons with decibels (you have to convert to bels, actually) for sound intensity. P.P.S: Sorry for scaring some of you with the crazy math stuff!
_________________________
“Hiking is just walking where it’s okay to pee. Sometimes old people hike by mistake.” — Demitri Martin
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132936 - 05/15/08 01:31 AM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: horizonseeker]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 08/03/07
Posts: 3078
|
I live in los angeles and this is a concern for me, earthquakes strikes without warning and the only thing that make me live long enough to use my preparation is pure luck of not buried in the initial tremor These videos may interest you about warnings of impending earthquakes. I find them pretty extraordinary!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKMTSDzU1Z4http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzVamNQzfYA
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#132953 - 05/15/08 04:22 AM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: CDVXF7]
|
Veteran
Registered: 09/01/05
Posts: 1474
|
One good part is that bamboo seems to be plentiful. Makes a great flexible and strong frame for shelter. Not sure whats supporting those relief tents though.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133146 - 05/17/08 07:02 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: LED]
|
Geezer
Registered: 01/21/04
Posts: 5163
Loc: W. WA
|
> Not sure whats supporting those relief tents though.
I think the plastic ones are held up with PVC or fiberglass rods, probably brought in en masse by relief organizations.
The Anchorage quake of 1964 was a 9.2. I think they had vertical landmovement of around 35 ft (some places split and raised that far from the adjoining scrap of land).
It's hard to comprehend.
Sue
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133179 - 05/18/08 09:37 AM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 10/15/05
Posts: 162
Loc: Korea
|
Do you have a reference for the Fox "News" story? I went to their web site and could find nothing about that.
A
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133183 - 05/18/08 12:20 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: ]
|
Cranky Geek
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 4642
Loc: Vermont
|
A rather incideary statement, and one I can't find on their website either. Did they give any proof, or was it just make it up as they go along?
_________________________
-IronRaven
When a man dare not speak without malice for fear of giving insult, that is when truth starts to die. Truth is the truest freedom.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133187 - 05/18/08 01:39 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: ironraven]
|
Addict
Registered: 03/20/05
Posts: 410
|
My heart goes out to these people and the orphans also. Most people (including Californians) have no idea how violent these can be. I was in an 8 in 1968 in Okinawa, you have to experience it to believe it. I wouldn't be surprised if the death toll was 10x what the govt. is admitting. I wish there were a way to help more in a tangible way (including Burma), but there isn't.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133251 - 05/19/08 11:58 AM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: steelie]
|
Addict
Registered: 09/13/07
Posts: 449
Loc: Texas
|
in places where earthquakes are a threat, what are the odds a reinforced "bomb shelter" type structure would help? even in the basement for instance, a steel cage type room that could withstand the weight of a crumbled house? with all the usual provisioning of course, this could serve as a good holding area until help arrived. is there even a chance of making it into the cage successfully? The problem with earthquake shelters is that you don't know to seek shelter before the initial shock, and if you survive that it's probably better to shelter in the open in anticipation of aftershocks than it is to go into a structure with gas lines, electrical lines, uncertain structural integrity, etc. It might make more sense to put resources into storing camping gear in an externally-accessible bin rather than trying to build in internal shelter: try to arrange things so that you don't go to go throughout the house to find all the parts of the tent, sleeping bags, etc. What makes sense depends on the layout of the house. A small shed out back for camping gear would be much preferred rather than going back in that house. (the popular view seems to be that you can't predict earthquakes, but you _can_ anticipate that there will be aftershocks, so speaking of preparing for an earthquake makes some sense) Disclaimer - I've never live in an earthquake area, only in hurricane country.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133282 - 05/19/08 08:34 PM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: CDVXF7]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/15/05
Posts: 2485
Loc: California
|
A scary but also (at least when I read it) optimistic article about a couple's ordeal of being buried together in their collapsed dormitory building for 28 hours. The building just came down almost as soon as they tried to run for cover. As the rubble subsided over time, breathing became extremely difficult as the weight of the debris pressed down on them. The couple actually had to coordinate their breathing because there wasn't enough room for both people to inhale at the same time. The husband eventually despaired and tried to kill him myself by twisting his neck against the surrounding debris but the wife kept his spirits up. Very sobering account to read. But they were both rescued and their daughter, at school at the time, was safe, too.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133314 - 05/20/08 03:23 AM
Re: Earthquake in China Thread
[Re: CDVXF7]
|
Newbie
Registered: 02/25/07
Posts: 45
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
|
0 registered (),
858
Guests and
62
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|