I am not a scientist nor an engineer but see one big flaw in the * Hydro-4000
that falcon5000 brought to our attention.

All current (new production) internal combustion engines use a pre-mapped fuel distribution program. This is controlled by data from all the sensors on the vehicle like: air intake, exhaust (that may or may not include multiband analisis of combusted gases as the sensor that reads only carbon dioxide is chaper to put in the vehicle), load (bases off either transmission spead/ or wheel speed, gear you are in and throtle position), etc.

All you are doing is adding hydrogen and a bit more oxygen to the air as it gets sucked into the engine by piston movement.

The problem is you are still putting the same ammout of gasoline or desil (spelling?) into the engine everytime the spark plug fires.

The claim on the web site is 15% uncombusted fuel or something close to that. Except the CPU that controlls the system is always trying to reach optimum effciency so the 15% is wrong.

If however you changed the mapping of the ammount of fuel injected and replaced some of it with the hydrogen oxygen combination, than you would see deffinite results.

Any increase in power would not decrease the fule consumption.

You could get the same results form mixing aviation fuel with pump gas for a higher octaine rating.

Just my thoughts....

If I am wrong on some of this please correct me.

And I wish it were true what the website claims.