#127993 - 03/21/08 01:01 PM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: benjammin]
|
Geezer
Registered: 09/30/01
Posts: 5695
Loc: Former AFB in CA, recouping fr...
|
Guns have a funny way of reloading themselves.
Years ago my partner and I were invited to a LAPD training day, at Universal Studios of all places. Great place to train. Anyway, in those days everyone carried wheelguns, and they practiced with cases that had been primed only, at their academy. Each case was inspected twice, by the person priming them, and another who boxed them. No one (except my partner and I) were allowed on the bus that transported the officers from their station to Universal with any ammo whatsoever. As the cases were issued they were again inspected twice, by the person issuing, and the officer receiving. Three officers received loaded wadcutter rounds! That is why I like the idea of the fake barrels, a round can not be chambered (we are of course talking semi-autos here), and everyone can see the yellow in the ejection port, and at the muzzle...
_________________________
OBG
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128000 - 03/21/08 01:33 PM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: xavier01]
|
Namu (Giant Tree)
Addict
Registered: 09/16/05
Posts: 664
Loc: Florida, USA
|
Slow is smooth, smooth is fast.
A guy that I teach TKD with says this a lot. He's full of crap most of the time (you know the type, always right, always has a better story, no one else's ideas are as good, always wants to look smart and important...) Most of the time his ideas are to be taken with a grain of salt, but I agree with him on this one. I've expressed this idea to the kids we work with from something I learned as a musician..."If you can't play it (do it) slow, you can't play it fast". The kids, when learning a new technique always want to do it fast right away, without learning the mechanics, and they always do it wrong and someone usually gets hurt at least a little. Point being...good advice Xavier.
_________________________
Ors, MAE, MT-BC Memento mori Vulnerant omnes, ultima necat (They all wound, the last kills)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128005 - 03/21/08 03:24 PM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: Ors]
|
Veteran
Registered: 09/17/07
Posts: 1219
Loc: here
|
I would err on the side of caution and use the red guns. Red, like the orange, is a signal to all that the weapon is not real. I know, I know, who carries a blue gun? However, there is nothing wrong with training with a lightweight weapon.
Here's a revelaton: not all weapons weigh the same! Also, you cannot poll your adversary to see which weapon they are using so you can calibrate your technique to weapon weight.
When I would worked with a smaller person in karate on take-ddown techniques, I would just stand there until they finally performed it right. Being tossed to the ground, with authority and force, by someone who is only 5'5" 140lbs shows it is about technique. I was 6'1" 215lbs at the time. Technique, technique, technique...
The majority of training is about the perfection of the movement and technique. A few ounces of weight difference should not impact your abilities once said technique is learned.
All that said, I could still be full of a decent amount of dookie.
Edited by MoBOB (03/21/08 03:24 PM)
_________________________
"Its not a matter of being ready as it is being prepared" -- B. E. J. Taylor
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128008 - 03/21/08 03:38 PM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: MoBOB]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 12/10/07
Posts: 844
Loc: NYC
|
I am definitely in agreement with those who say to not use a gun that could function. It's simply not a safe enough thing to do, no matter how many times it has been checked. I recently handled a pistol that I know has been disabled, because it was welded that way, decades ago. Still should be treated as if it could fire.
Otherwise, the idea behind slow practice, and I am aware of it's use in tai chi, is that you do it slow to do it PERFECT. If you have it slow and perfect, then when you seek to do it fast, it are unlikely to be good enough.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128016 - 03/21/08 04:49 PM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: Ors]
|
Veteran
Registered: 07/08/07
Posts: 1268
Loc: Northeastern Ontario, Canada
|
Hi Ors,
The ASP "Red Guns" are considerable lighter than an actual firearm. I have never used "Blue Guns" but have used heavier, solid metal replica firearms in weapon retention and disarming drills. In disarming techniques the firearm is often twisted violently and fingers can get trapped in the trigger gaurd with resulting physical damage, therefore some training guns have the trigger gaurd removed. Concerning weapon retention, the trigger gaurd is often required to work with the holster design to "lock" the firearm into the holster, retention drills use this system to advantage.
During an assault when a person is trying to take your firearm you are in a fight for your life. In a high stress situation you will instantly revert back to your training, so you practice the drills with near the same intensity as in a real situation. Firearms are often dropped or thrown during training. The fight you are in is with your assailant; when you are in a hand-on-hand struggle over possession/retention of a firearm, a few ounces of firearm weight difference is not noticed. That being said if I was going to purchase one replica training "gun" I would try to have it duplicate my firearm exactly, but be of a bright colour.
I would never use an actual firearm in retention/disarming drills. Safety mistakes can and have happened and I would not want to subject a firearm that I may later stake my life on, to that amount of unrequired abuse.
Train the way you live and stay safe,
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128023 - 03/21/08 05:45 PM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: SwampDonkey]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: 12/19/07
Posts: 259
|
When us bouncers used to informally train (beat the hell out of each other) we tried to use what was as close to the real thing as possible. This way IRL the "mechanics" are the same, the real gun and dummy gun wil throw the same distance, hit equally as hard in a pistolwhip/barrel thump.....etc. So my recommandation is to get a blue gun, it may hurt a little more at times but to quote a famous shrink "that which does not kill us makes us stronger". And to add my 2¢, I would only train with a real gun IF, and only if, it had one one bright yellow polymer barrel inserts. There is no chamber, so even if live bullets were used in the clip to fully simulate weight a round COULD NOT MYSTEROUSLY FIND ITS WAY INTO BATTERY. The one slight, and extremely narrow debateable advantage this would allow is to train the possibilty of pushing/shoving the slide back in a gun grab, then gripping it with hells fury while you try to finish getting the gun out of the opponents hand. By pushing it out of battery, usually as little as ¼" will keep the weapon from firing. It has happened IRL, more often than not purely by luck, but it can and does happen.
-Bill Liptak
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128047 - 03/22/08 01:21 AM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: Dan_McI]
|
Addict
Registered: 08/14/05
Posts: 601
Loc: FL, USA
|
Red or Blue.....just NOT a REAL one!!!!!!!!!!
Please do not become "One for my files" of the stories that my students get on What NOT to do.....
Stay safe.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128048 - 03/22/08 01:44 AM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: CJK]
|
Journeyman
Registered: 08/02/05
Posts: 73
Loc: Minnesota
|
Red or Blue.....just NOT a REAL one!!!!!!!!!!
Please do not become "One for my files" of the stories that my students get on What NOT to do.....
Stay safe. +1 to that! I've used both and it really doesn't matter. You want to learn a technique, not draw and shoot it. One thing I would recomend is that you file off the sights on whatever training gun you buy. I've lost lots of skin on plastic sights. For what it's worth I've even traced the outline of my pistol onto a 2x6 and used a jig-saw to cut it out. I then rounded off the corners and painted it. The beauty of that was there was no trigger hole to put a finger into and thus loose a finger. Take Care and Stay Safe.
_________________________
It's a Jungle out there.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128090 - 03/23/08 11:01 AM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: benjammin]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: 10/21/07
Posts: 231
Loc: Greensboro, NC
|
As a graduate of several firearm training courses, both municipal and private, I firmly subscribe (and dilligently practice) the following four firearm safety rules: 1). Always treat every weapon as if it were loaded. 2). Never allow the muzzle to cover anything that you are not willing to destroy. 3). Keep your finger outside the trigger guard until ready to shoot. 4). Be certain of the target and what's in line with it, both in front of and beyond it. As a range officer, I've had at least three incidents where someone with an "empty" gun had an accidental discharge. One interesting thing that I noticed while attending the Front Sight Firearms Training Institute is that they absolutely refuse to ever use the term "accidental discharge". Firearms simply don't discharge by themselves, so anytime a firearm discharges "accidentally", one or more of the four rules above have not been followed, and therefore by definition the more appropriate term to use is "negligent discharge". Jim
_________________________
My EDC and FAK
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128112 - 03/23/08 06:28 PM
Re: Training gun preferences?
[Re: Paragon]
|
Addict
Registered: 08/14/05
Posts: 601
Loc: FL, USA
|
As I've always told my students.....more people have been shot with an 'unloaded' firearm than just about any other kind.....
That usually gets them thinking......
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
0 registered (),
607
Guests and
20
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|