Originally Posted By: benjammin
we are both free to pursue whatever it is that makes us happy so long as such pursuit doesn't impinge on the rights of others.


Who decides if it impringes on the rights of others? The one doing the act? The "impringed" person? A third party? The courts? The religious authorities? Trial by combat?

This is the problem. The sentiment sounds and is a good one. Implementing it is tough. Who decides? And where and from who do they get the criteria for their decision?
_________________________
"Better is the enemy of good enough."