While I think its good that this person was stopped, does it seem like the prosecuter is trying to beat the drum a little loud on this case?

He's shown posing with the boy's "huge arsenal of weapons" when the fine print tells that only one of those was a real firearm, the rest were all BB guns that look like real weapons. The print also states that there was no ammunition for the single firearm in the house. And pardon me but since when is a 9mm rifle an assault rifle, isn't a rifle that fires a pistol cartridge typically refered to as a carbine? Finally, grenades are not weapons of mass destruction. Weapons of mass destruction only encompass biological, chemical and radiological weapons.

Again, I think the boy needed to be stopped. His parents were enabling him, not stepping up and acting like parents. He obviously needed some sort of counciling long before this situation reached the point where he was obtaining guns and building grenades. But it sounds an awful lot like a prosecuter setting up to run for office, or some other type of politiking.