#103064 - 08/20/07 01:54 PM
Matches smatches... Not reliable?
|
Newbie
Registered: 03/15/07
Posts: 31
Loc: Guyana, South America
|
Matches??? Just how reliable are matches? Do I want to depend on them in the field as my primary fire starting source?
I got some of the NATO Waterproof and Windproof matches and was feeling pleased with myself until I tried to light one. Turns out that the substance on the striking surface (the top of the lid) had gone tacky (soft and sticky) and that the matches was scraping it off.
Bad matches or my bad luck?
OK. After that, I got some of the Coghlans matches. These work, but the matches are so difficult to light that it just takes is a few matches to completely wear away and destroy the striking surface.
Can I make a striking surface if I get the chemicals?
I know the current wisdom is that you should have at least 2 methods of starting a fire. So if I carry matches, do I have 2 methods? Or just one?
Hmmm... Heating the NATO matches striking surface might harden it so that it might work... Then again it might ignite... Time to move to the backyard with a water hose...
_________________________
"Things to know: a trade and how to swim"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#103065 - 08/20/07 01:58 PM
Re: Matches smatches... Not reliable?
[Re: Naseem]
|
Old Hand
Registered: 03/18/06
Posts: 1032
Loc: The Netherlands
|
I had the same problem with my NATO-matches, so I tossed them. I use Coghlan's wind/waterproof matches wich work just fine. Not hard to light and if the striker strip wears out, I just take a new one..
_________________________
''It's time for Plan B...'' ''We have a Plan B?'' ''No, but it's time for one.'' -Stargate SG-1
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#103067 - 08/20/07 02:04 PM
Re: Matches smatches... Not reliable?
[Re: Naseem]
|
Geezer
Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5357
Loc: SOCAL
|
I prefer a Bic lighter. I'd use the NATO matches as tinder
_________________________
Better is the Enemy of Good Enough. Okay, what’s your point??
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#103073 - 08/20/07 03:19 PM
Re: Matches smatches... Not reliable?
[Re: Russ]
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/12/04
Posts: 1204
Loc: Nottingham, UK
|
I wouldn't rely on matches. In addition to the problems you mention, they take up a lot of space for a relatively small number of lights. They don't cope well with wet or wind. They don't burn for very long, either.
I prefer cigarette lighters, and ferro rods.
_________________________
Quality is addictive.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#103076 - 08/20/07 04:02 PM
Re: Matches smatches... Not reliable?
[Re: NightHiker]
|
Journeyman
Registered: 02/22/07
Posts: 80
|
micro bic, and a fire steel flint, go in my bag.
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#103078 - 08/20/07 05:01 PM
Re: Matches smatches... Not reliable?
[Re: Virginia_Mark]
|
Crazy Canuck
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 02/03/07
Posts: 3240
Loc: Alberta, Canada
|
Mostly, I don't bother with matches any more. A mini Bic in my pocket, a full-size Bic in each pack, and a candle or equivalent for tinder.
I sometimes carry one of the new super-hot flints, if only for entertainment. (Also, they're okay on airlines.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#103091 - 08/20/07 07:46 PM
Re: Matches smatches... Not reliable?
[Re: dougwalkabout]
|
Addict
Registered: 05/06/04
Posts: 604
Loc: Manhattan
|
I don't know what people do to their matches to have such problems. I carry a cheap plastic match safe full of untreated strike anywhere kitchen matches and I've never had a problem. I know, I don't get as many lights in the same space as a bic lighter. On the other hand, I know exactly how many fire lighting attempts I have, and I don't really expect to need to start hundreds of fires. Plus I keep a piece of lamp wick with the matches so I know I always have some dry tinder if I need it. I've also found matches to be better for lighting things like stoves and lanterns then lighters.
_________________________
A gentleman should always be able to break his fast in the manner of a gentleman where so ever he may find himself.--Good Omens
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#103114 - 08/20/07 09:38 PM
Re: Matches smatches... Not reliable?
[Re: Am_Fear_Liath_Mor]
|
Crazy Canuck
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 02/03/07
Posts: 3240
Loc: Alberta, Canada
|
Moisture is the enemy of matches. Back when I used matches more, I used to like the "lifeboat" style safety matches. They had great long heads and worked really well for firelighting in wet conditions. I would put them in a matchsafe, and would tear off the striker strips from the box, fold them in half (paper sides out) and tuck them inside. Both matches and strikers seemed to stay fresh a long time.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#103118 - 08/20/07 10:09 PM
Re: Matches smatches... Not reliable?
[Re: dougwalkabout]
|
"Be Prepared"
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 06/26/04
Posts: 2210
Loc: NE Wisconsin
|
I EDC a BSA HotSpark - ever since I saw Tom Hanks in that shipwreck movie (name escapes me at the moment - old age!).
When in the field I ALWAYS carry a refillable butane lighter, a magfire sparker, a bag of Vaseline-covered cotton balls, and some kind of matches. The lighter is my primary means of lighting fire while camping.
When out with the Scouts - always relatively local - I carry strike-anywhere matches in one of those cheap orange plastic waterproof (?) match cases. These are mostly used to light my Coleman fuel lantern (the only decent way to light it I've found).
When out in more extreme regions (Glacier National Park most recently) I carry a K&M aluminum waterproof matchcase with REI waterproof matches and a striker pad. I do light one off every once in a while to make sure they are still functional.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
0 registered (),
845
Guests and
23
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|