Originally Posted By: Susan
There's a lot I have never understood about fools and money.

Just within the past few weeks, a local woman finally made it to the top of Everest... on the third try. So that's about $120,000 plus equipment? To climb a rock?

"Because it's there" isn't good enough. I doubt that the "challenge" or all the other reasons usually offered have much to do with it. If the status value were removed, how many people would be climbing Everest?

Is it any different from the sorry people who feel the need to buy expensive cars, uncommon breeds of dogs or cats, or exotic pets or $15,000 watches, or a big hulking AWD SUV that doesn't have a scratch on it? Isn't it just another pathetic way to say, "Look at me! Look what I did! Look how wonderful I am!"?

I've heard that the trail to the top of Everest is littered with dead bodies. When I hear of yet another person dying trying to "conquer" Everest, I just shake my head and wonder at the pathetic people who have such low self-esteem that they are driven to do something that is so.... inconsequential.

$120,000 to feed your ego and impress your friends.

Pathetic.

Sue
Sue, please don't hold back, tell us what you really think wink But for the record, I agree. Folks who are into climbing and train to take on a major challenge is one thing. Paying big bucks for a hike to the top with the necessary gear and O2 carried by sherpas and then leaving someone behind because they're almost dead is inhuman and pathetic.

The "accomplishment" of climbing Everest no longer impresses me. Send me a postcard from K2.
_________________________
Better is the Enemy of Good Enough.
Okay, what’s your point??