That sounds like the thinking that came out of McNamera's Pentagon during Vietnam. His "wiz kids" (mostly accountants and MBA types) held the notion that "for x rounds expended there should be y dead bad guys". "Body count" is not a good way to run a war.
JimJr
I'm not sure what you are arguing here. The ratio of 250,000 rounds fired per dead bad guy sounds like a worthless statistic that some bored newspaper guy came up with. But I'll play along to this extent: if that is the level of practice it takes to maintain the best military in the world, then so be it. If it appears wasteful, well, welcome to the wonderful world of the Pentagon.