Equipped To Survive Equipped To Survive® Presents
The Survival Forum
Where do you want to go on ETS?

Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#292073 - 04/02/19 04:27 PM Re: New portable Solar charger [Re: hikermor]
Russ Online   content
Geezer

Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5207
Loc: SOCAL
Hikermor ó donít toss that GZ Nomad 7 just yet. The testing Iíve done and will complete soon (I need to double check some numbers) show the Nomad 7 doing okay.
Goal Zero Nomad 7: USB: 4.64 volts, .95 amps = 4.41 watts ó which is 63% of the number in its name, not bad at all and easily enough to charge a cellphone.

Iíll publish all the numbers later (maybe today).

Top
#292185 - 04/18/19 02:42 PM Re: New portable Solar charger [Re: Russ]
Russ Online   content
Geezer

Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 5207
Loc: SOCAL
Almost done. Iím waiting for a solar panel manufacturer to get back (or not) regarding poor performance of their panel. So far they havenít even acknowledged the email, so I will probably delete the name of the panel in the results summary. I may even just delete that panel from the summary.

Having a portable solar panel would be great to have in a bug-out kit, or during the aftermath of a massive earthquake or other natural disaster that can break the electric grid locally. It would also be very nice to have following a massive solar flare event such as the Solar storm of 1859 aka the Carrington Event, if the solar panel survives the event.

Top
#292186 - 04/18/19 03:52 PM Re: New portable Solar charger [Re: Russ]
haertig Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 03/13/05
Posts: 2089
Loc: Colorado
I would just post the results of that panel. If the panel doesn't work as it's supposed to, and the manufacturer doesn't respond, then that is valuable information that people may want to know. No need to editorialize on those particular results. Just post them, and they will speak for themselves.

"Panel XYZ from manufacturer ABC, advertised MNO watts, measured TUV watts. Attempted to contact manufacturer about the apparent discrepancy and testing methods, but received no response."

Posting factual stuff like the above is fine. But editorializing by saying something like, "Manfuacturer ABC is a total *&%^! and I would never buy their piece of ^&*$ product!!!" might get you into trouble.

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3



Moderator:  Alan_Romania, Blast, chaosmagnet, cliff 
October
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online
2 registered (Roarmeister, Janysboy), 208 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
AppalachianGirl, BereniceStanaway, aakanksha, 9Line, SkiSoloII
5295 Registered Users
Newest Posts
celox and other blood clotting
by Robert_McCall
Today at 03:13 AM
Improvise! The need for a Plan B
by hikermor
Today at 12:34 AM
Recon Medical Tourniquets
by Burncycle
Yesterday at 07:31 PM
Power outages in the Bay Area
by Russ
Yesterday at 03:44 PM
Equipped.org Fox 40 Micro Whistles Available
by pforeman
Yesterday at 03:05 PM
Biggest Concerns in an SHTF Situation
by Russ
10/12/19 09:01 PM
A Cautionary Tale
by nursemike
10/12/19 01:42 AM
Big Winter storm
by Phaedrus
10/12/19 01:32 AM
Newest Images
Tiny knife / wrench
Handmade knives
2"x2" Glass Signal Mirror, Retroreflective Mesh
Trade School Tool Kit
My Pocket Kit
Glossary
Test

WARNING & DISCLAIMER: SELECT AND USE OUTDOORS AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES AND TECHNIQUES AT YOUR OWN RISK. Information posted on this forum is not reviewed for accuracy and may not be reliable, use at your own risk. Please review the full WARNING & DISCLAIMER about information on this site.