This looks to be the same, or similar, article:
http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/n03434274-bacteria-antibiotics/Bacteria have a nasty habit of exchanging snippets of DNA. And for all practical purposes once a bacterial line develop resistance they never seem to lose it. There was/is at line of thinking that says if a bacterial line isn't exposed to an agent it is resistant to that over time they will lose its resistance. But this hasn't been demonstrated. It doesn't mean it isn't true to some degree. Perhaps it takes a thousand or more years for the effect to be seen. Unfortunately, given the rate at which bacteria are developing resistance we don't have a thousand years.
Antibiotics should be much less widely dispensed. The main reason why cattle get antibiotics is because we tightly pack them on feed lots where they live 24/7 in their own excrement. In those conditions antibiotics are vital to prevent infections and contagion in the close-packed herd. Range-fed cattle fatten up more slowly but they much more rarely need any antibiotics.
Humans taking antibiotics excrete them relatively unmodified in their waste. If we really want to limit the development of resistance we might think of enforcing use and isolating the waste stream from people taking critical antibiotics. These wastes would be disposed of by means which destroy the antibiotics. High temperature incineration should do it.
In the wider view you have to remember that most, if not all, have their origin in bacteria and fungus. Penicillin from bread mold as an example. It took, presumably, millions of years for the tiny critters to develop this material. While humans like to think we developed them in fact we just use what others had originally created.
IMHO we need to make best use and preserve any advantage we can. Blowing the benefits of an antibiotic on useless activities or because we are lazy about how we raise livestock is foolish.
... "mysterious Morgellons Syndrome and some scientists traced it to people being infected with a strain of soil bacteria."
There is very little evidence that says this is anything but hypochondria and a desire to be 'special'. Essentially a psychological condition. Possibly including a form of Münchhausen's syndrome. The supposed relationship between a known bacteria and Morgellans, assuming it is an actual disease, is based entirely on a known tendency of this bacteria to produce something resembling threads and an assumption that the visually similar stringy structures have something in common. So far there is little to no evidence to support this assumption.
