Emergency fire shelters

Posted by: redflare

Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 10:15 AM

I keep reading about these "emergency fire shelters" that firefighters had to deploy in order survive while being surrounded by a fire. Does anyone know what they look like? Any information?

" ... He said a dozen firefighters battling blazes in the Irvine and Lake Forest areas had to deploy emergency shelters, a last resort when they are surrounded by flames, or take cover in buildings." from San Francisco Chronicle article
Posted by: Matt26

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 12:25 PM

Check out this pdf that I found. http://www.nwcg.gov/pms/pubs/fireshelt01.pdf
I haven't read it, but I will just out of sheer curiosity.
Posted by: KenK

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 12:52 PM

Sigh, I already had a tremendous amount of respect for firefighters, but after reading that publication, wow. Those brave folks fighting wildfires are real superheros.

Thanks for the link.

Ken K.
Posted by: Matt26

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 04:07 PM

About 15 years ago I was in Denver for a wedding and was introduced to a Wildland FF from California. I told him that I thought he was nuts and that it had to be more dangerous than structural firefighting. He just laughed an said that he and his coworkers think the same thing about us structural guys as the sane people are trying to get out of the burning building while we were busting a** to get inside! Diferent point of views I guess. But you're right, those people got stones the size of melons as far as I'm concerned!
Posted by: Alan_Romania

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 04:10 PM

I do both and each has it's own dangers...

of course at a wildland fire you can run to the "black".
Posted by: Matt26

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 04:13 PM

I've done some grass land stuff, felt some pretty good heat doing it and I would still rather go inside. Hat's off to all you folks out there! Stay safe.
Posted by: Arney

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 04:26 PM

Originally Posted By: Alan_Romania
of course at a wildland fire you can run to the "black".

Is that done? I mean, if the fire is large enough and fast enough that you're about to be overrun by a wall of flame and thinking of deploying a fire shelter and hunkering down, then wouldn't you likely get severely burned trying to run through the flames into the black? Those wildland uniforms are Nomex, but still...

Just a quick change of topic, but this morning, I'm finding myself coughing quite a bit for the first time since Sunday. I'm rather sensitive to things in the air in general. Unlike yesterday, the sky here is filled with smoke from the Santiago Canyon fire and the sun is a dim orange overhead. I don't really smell smoke, but it must be all that microscopic soot that is bothering me. I just brought out my N95 masks and put one on about 15 minutes ago. I have noticed that my coughing has subsided. I'll likely never use these N95 for some pandemic, but I'm glad that I can put them to use now. Unfortunately, I wish I had one with an exhaust valve to keep things cooler. It's OK now, while it's cooler, but it'll be hot this afternoon.
Posted by: Alan_Romania

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 05:49 PM

There is always the chance that you will have fire between you and the burnt area, but the safest place to work a wildland fire is with "one foot in the black". With fire moving as fast as it is in SoCal, direct attack isn't realy possible. But if you can get to it, the black is still the safesty place to be.

Of course this isn't alway possible, when protecting structures and indirectly attacking a fire (building line ahead of an advancing front) but you setup LCES (lookouts, communication,. escape routes and safety zones) and keep a heads-up. Wildland firefighting is intrinsicly safer, it is typically a failure of putting in place LCES or ignoring the "18 watch outs" that get wildland firefighters in trouble.
Posted by: MDinana

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 07:08 PM

From what I've heard, the fire shelters aren't "fireproof." i think they're more for flash-over types of fire, or to protect from radiant heat. You can't sit in one while in the middle of a BBQ, if you catch my drift.

FF's still die while in them.
Posted by: Art_in_FL

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 07:12 PM

Those shelters are not without their limitations. I recently read the book: "The Thirtymile Fire: A Chronicle of Bravery and Betrayal" by John MacRae

http://www.amazon.com/Thirtymile-Fire-Chronicle-Bravery-Betrayal/dp/080507578X

It is a good read. Gives you a feeling for wildland fires, how they are handled, how things go wrong and how, in the end, luck and the smallest details of terrain and timing can decide who lives and who dies.

The biggest problem was that due to sloppy tactics and a lack of clear command structure a team of firefighters were put into danger where they were surrounded by and overrun by the fire.

And how by a lack of luck and understanding a subset of the group deployed their shelters in exactly the wrong spot. A location where the wind driven flames would concentrate heat and far exceed the capabilities of the shelters to protect the trapped firefighters.

The investigators observed that the effects of the fire in that location were highly variable. Where the people died the earth was baked hard and obliterated. Obviously exposed to extremely high temperatures. While only twenty feet away brush still had leaves. Had the shelter been deployed just a short distance away they would have had a good chance of living.

Better still would have been the larger group never being placed in enough danger to need shelters or, failing that, that everyone would have deployed where the other groups survived being overrun. The other groups ,made it even though they had fewer shelters than people. One brave firefighter made it through with three people under her shelter.

Unfortunately the book doesn't cover many of of the technical aspects of the shelters, a simple technical drawing and detailed description would have been a useful seeing as that so much of the action has to do with these devices, but it is still a good read without it.

Thanks for the link NightHiker. Haven't looked at it yet but perhaps the PDF will answer questions and fill in details left over from the book.

Hint to writers: If a story includes equipment or terrain as a central character be sure to include enough visual aids or detailed descriptions to make it all clear to the reader. It is old-hat to you but you can't assume any prior knowledge from the reader. Who may be reading the story a decade after the fact and half a world away.


OT:
For those who may be buying filter masks:
"I wish I had one with an exhaust valve to keep things cooler."

Amen to that. Even when it's cool the exhaust valve makes the mask a whole lot more comfortable and less tiring to wear. Your not re-breathing your own exhaust as much. There are some people who simply can't wear a filter mask because it brings up feelings of smothering. Some of these people can tolerate a mask with an exhaust valve because it feels more natural.

And, as you point out, when it gets hot and humid an exhaust valve is the only way to go. Big difference.

I didn't wish to hijack the thread but something to keep in mind when you buy filter masks. My advice is: spend the extra money. If and when you need to wear one you will consider that money well spent. Trust me on this one. Better yet, try one yourself. Wear one while exercising, as you may need to in a survival situation, and odds are the next ones you buy will have exhaust valves.

Posted by: Alan_Romania

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/24/07 09:43 PM

Oh, being in a situation that requires fire shelter deployment is a BAD thing. They are simply the last level of protection, and while the new shelters are significantly better then the old version I still expect to not survive a deployment where we are burned over. Many things have gone wrong if shelters have been deployed.
Posted by: bsmith

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 11:56 AM


to purchase:

http://www.forestry-suppliers.com/product_pages/View_Catalog_Page.asp?mi=2575

Posted by: BOD

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 01:41 PM

There is no mention of weight. Does anyone know?

Am I wrong in thinking that they would make a good survival shelter in general and if reversable a winter shelter?

Certainly looks as if one should be carried in the car if not on the person
Posted by: CANOEDOGS

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 02:24 PM


it weighs 2 1/2 pounds...i just put the one i posted the
photo of on my Gear Week post onto a fishing scale and
thats about what it came to in the yellow nylon case..
if you want more info i would Goggle "fire shelter"..
i got this one for show and tell when i did "how to camp"
talks..the Google links will give more than you want to
know about the "shake and bake"--it's a last ditch life
saver and if you get out of it with just 2nd degree burns
your lucky...some photos show the chared remains of a
firefighters gear around what left of a shelter that was
only half out of its bag...they are only ment for one use..
they also had photos of shelters that saved lives--they had
a scorched look and were in the middle of a open area that
had been swept over by fire..i'm sure you would not survive
in a burning forest but only in a place thats open with the
fire quickly passing over..
Posted by: OldBaldGuy

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 02:27 PM

Boy are those things expensive!!!
Posted by: CANOEDOGS

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 02:36 PM


OBG--yes they are $$$$$$..but thats the difference between
"real stuff" and the junky copys of police and military gear
they sell to "wanabes"

Posted by: OldBaldGuy

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 02:40 PM

Yup, you usually get what you pay for...
Posted by: Alan_Romania

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 05:39 PM

The new Shelters are bigger and heavier then the old version like Canoedogs has. I don't have a scale with me, but comparing the two I would guess it weighs about 1/2 pound more.

If you really want one, you can get one for around $350 from http://www.firecache.com/prodinfo.asp?number=25.1205.
Posted by: Doug_Ritter

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 05:49 PM

Originally Posted By: OldBaldGuy
Yup, you usually get what you pay for...

As I often point out, not necessarily. But, almost for sure you won't get it if you don't pay for it. It's a subtle, but critical difference.
Posted by: Susan

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/25/07 10:57 PM

"Yup, you usually get what you pay for..."

QUICK! The fire is moving at 40 mph straight for you and there's no shelter. How much will you pay for a shelter right now?

Sue
Posted by: ironraven

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/26/07 03:25 AM

I asked my brother the firefighter that question after he finished his wildland training. He laughed- not the "of course" laugh, or the "are you joking" laugh, more of the "if they issued us toe tags it would be bad for morale" laugh.

For the size, the Thermolite bivy from AMK is a better buy. Use the proper tool and you'll be happy. The fire shelter was designed to give you a chance at surviving a fast moving fire. The Thermolite was designed to be an emergency sleeping bag.

Posted by: Arney

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/29/07 01:06 AM

Here's a firsthand description of the firefighters deploying their shelters that day.
Posted by: CANOEDOGS

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 10/29/07 02:10 AM


Arney..the LA Times wants a sign up--i got my info right from
NFS site..
Posted by: Alan_Romania

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 11/08/07 12:51 PM

http://www.latimes.com/la-burnover-f,0,732907.flash?coll=la-home-center

Pictures and radio traffic from the Orange County Deployment.
Posted by: Stu

Re: Emergency fire shelters - 11/08/07 03:05 PM

Thank you for sharing. Very interesting.