Carry the ThermoLite bivvy since buying couple of months ago, but haven't tested/used under actual conditions – just post-purchase inspection. Chose it for: weight; price; stuff sack; non-conductivity; "ventability."
Key facts on the three products I focused on:
AMK TL Bivvy, the
Land/Shark, and the
Blizzard Survival Bag (similar to other two, but has its own unique features).
• Cost - Bivvy $22.95; Land/Shark $39.99; Blizzard $44.30
• Size - Bivvy & Land/Shark 36"x84"; Blizzard 88"x107"
• Packed Size - Bivvy 4 x6" (cylindrical); Land/Shark 8"x6"x1"; Blizzard 8.3"x4.3"x1.2"
• Packed Volume - Bivvy 75.4 cu.in.; Land/Shark 48 cu.in.; Blizzard 43 cu.in.
• Weight - Bivvy 6.5 oz; Land/Shark 18 oz; Blizzard 12 oz
• Conductive? - Bivvy no; Land/Shark yes; Blizzard yes (factor if you expect to encounter lightning)
• Stuff Sack - Bivvy included; Land/Shark $6.95; Blizzard $8.85
• Material - Bivvy ThermoLite 4-ply polyolefin; Land/Shark aluminized film laminated w/compositie reinforced ripstop material (like Benjammin said, material sounds similar to
Space All-Weather Blanket ; Blizzard Reflexcell 3-layers of insulating air cells w/aluminum coating.
• Misc - Bivvy is softest & can be vented; Land/Shark appears to be most durable; Blizzard looks to have pretty good thermal efficiency and has body-hugging elasticized construction.
The hardest thing to quantify was the relative efficiency (under same conditions, which keeps you warmest?) of each; the manufacturers tend to not present their info apples-to-apples. I will say, the Blizzard offers some interesting
performance comparisons. Is it just well-presented marketing hype? I don't know.